Elastic Search vs Pinecone comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Elastic Logo
2,316 views|796 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Pinecone Logo
1,025 views|982 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Elastic Search and Pinecone based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Vector Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Search vs. Pinecone Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The forced merge and forced resonate features reduce the data size increasing reliability.""It's a stable solution and we have not had any issues.""ELK Elasticsearch is 100% scalable as scalability is built into the design""It provides deep visibility into your cloud and distributed applications, from microservices to serverless architectures. It quickly identifies and resolves the root causes of issues, like gaining visibility into all the cloud-based and on-prem applications.""A good use case is saving metadata of your systems for data cataloging. Various systems, like those opened in metadata and similar applications, use Elasticsearch to store their text data.""The product is scalable with good performance.""It is stable.""I am impressed with the product's Logstash. The tool is fast and customizable. You can build beautiful dashboards with it. It is useful and reliable."

More Elastic Search Pros →

"We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases.""The semantic search capability is very good.""The most valuable features of the solution are similarity search and maximal marginal relevance search for retrieval purposes.""The product's setup phase was easy."

More Pinecone Pros →

Cons
"Elastic Enterprise Search could improve its SSL integration easier. We should not need to go to the back-end servers to do configuration, we should be able to do it on the GUI.""The solution must provide AI integrations.""There is another solution I'm testing which has a 500 record limit when you do a search on Elastic Enterprise Search. That's the only area in which I'm not sure whether it's a limitation on our end in terms of knowledge or a technical limitation from Elastic Enterprise Search. There is another solution we are looking at that rides on Elastic Enterprise Search. And the limit is for any sort of records that you're doing or data analysis you're trying to do, you can only extract 500 records at a time. I know the open-source nature has a lot of limitations, Otherwise, Elastic Enterprise Search is a fantastic solution and I'd recommend it to anyone.""They could improve some of the platform's infrastructure management capabilities.""It should be easier to use. It has been getting better because many functions are pre-defined, but it still needs improvement.""This product could be improved with additional security, and the addition of support for machine learning devices.""Elastic Enterprise Search could improve the report templates.""Could have more open source tools and testing."

More Elastic Search Cons →

"For testing purposes, the product should offer support locally as it is one area where the tool has shortcomings.""The tool does not confirm whether a file is deleted or not.""Onboarding could be better and smoother.""The product fails to offer a serverless type of storage capacity."

More Pinecone Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I have experience with the tool's free version."
  • "The solution is relatively cheaper than other vector DBs in the market."
  • More Pinecone Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Top Answer:We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases.
    Top Answer:Onboarding could be better and smoother. Navigation is difficult because most of us rely on watching tutorials on YouTube to understand how to use this software. The onboarding journey should explain… more »
    Top Answer:We've been building an ERP dashboard using generative UI. We needed a vector database to retrieve and implement augmentation, so we opted to use Pinecone. We chose Pinecone because it covers most of… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    2,316
    Comparisons
    796
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    507
    Rating
    8.3
    6th
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    1,025
    Comparisons
    982
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    545
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Faiss logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Milvus logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Qdrant logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    OpenSearch logo
    Compared 37% of the time.
    Faiss logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Qdrant logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Redis logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    LanceDB logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    Pinecone is a powerful tool for efficiently storing and retrieving vector embeddings. It is highly praised for its scalability, speed, and ease of integration with existing workflows. 

    Users find it particularly useful for similarity search, recommendation systems, and natural language processing. 

    Its efficient search capabilities, seamless integration with existing systems, and ability to handle large-scale datasets make it a valuable tool for data analysis and retrieval.

    Sample Customers
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    1. Airbnb 2. DoorDash 3. Instacart 4. Lyft 5. Pinterest 6. Reddit 7. Slack 8. Snapchat 9. Spotify 10. TikTok 11. Twitter 12. Uber 13. Zoom 14. Adobe 15. Amazon 16. Apple 17. Facebook 18. Google 19. IBM 20. Microsoft 21. Netflix 22. Salesforce 23. Shopify 24. Square 25. Tesla 26. TikTok 27. Twitch 28. Uber Eats 29. WhatsApp 30. Yelp 31. Zillow 32. Zynga
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Educational Organization9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Elastic Search vs. Pinecone
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Search vs. Pinecone and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Vector Databases with 59 reviews while Pinecone is ranked 6th in Vector Databases with 4 reviews. Elastic Search is rated 8.2, while Pinecone is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pinecone writes "Helps retrieve data, relatively cheaper, and provides useful documentation". Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Azure Search, Amazon Kendra and Qdrant, whereas Pinecone is most compared with OpenSearch, Faiss, Qdrant, Redis and LanceDB. See our Elastic Search vs. Pinecone report.

    See our list of best Vector Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Vector Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.