We performed a comparison between ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Fortinet FortiSandbox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to push policies and also to restrict an installation or to restrict any form of threat within the policy has been quite useful."
"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Security is the antivirus for the endpoints."
"The pricing is good."
"Technical support has been very good. They are helpful and responsive."
"We do not have a domain structure yet but we can manage our client stations via this solution's managing interface. This means that we don't need to have any extra management platforms."
"This solution has a traditional antivirus, I believe that signature-based detection is most valuable."
"It effectively catches unwanted stuff. It has saved our bacon over many years."
"The solution has a very good endpoint feature."
"The solution extracts an attached file before reaching the user and notifies the user if there's something malicious in the attachment received along with an email."
"One of the valuable features is its ability to detect new threats."
"The solution is easy to manage."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox's most valuable feature is the security it provides against threats, such as ransomware. Additionally, it integrates well with APIs."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance it offers to users is good, making it useful for us in our company."
"The dynamic behavior analysis is excellent. We have many attacks caught by the FortiSandbox as zero-day attacks. Additionally, the administration is simple and can be customized to fit your companies needs."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are the analysis options, artificial intelligence, and the many interfaces it provides."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox is scalable."
"The tool needs to explore security possibilities to secure iOS and Mac devices."
"The adware module could be improved."
"Its initial setup process could be more straightforward."
"There are some complexities if you want to manipulate the software."
"The detection could be better in ESET Endpoint Security. Sometimes it takes time to detect threats and might be because it's not holding all the memory. There are some features that have to mature. More features might be available in the higher-end product."
"The management of the solution isn't as clear as it could be. They could adjust that to make it a better product."
"I saw a bunch of false positives which need to be fixed."
"It would be nice to have more features in vulnerability scanning, which I believe will happen eventually."
"For the MSSPs, it would be great if the product could display all the threat chains on a dashboard since it is an area where the tool is currently lacking."
"It would be better if it had support for Mac and Linux."
"The initial setup is not too complex but could be easier."
"The integration is limited. The solution needs to offer better integration with multiple vendors."
"At least once a week we have a false alarm. This needs to be adjusted so that we get fewer of these occurrences."
"In future releases, I would like to see more automation capabilities."
"The use cases in Fortinet FortiSandbox are not good. It is difficult to upload a custom VM for Fortinet FortiSandbox. The integration of Fortinet FortiSandbox with other Fortinet or FortiGate firewalls is not good. VMs are already installed in the hardware and are working fine, but we tried to approve the custom VM many times but did not succeed."
"It should be easier to import custom virtual machines. Some of the VMs that are in FortiSandbox don't have the applications that we have in our environment. We need to import a VM with specific applications that we use in our environment. Have all the licenses because this is a real environment. You need a license for the Windows client you run on it. It's possible to import custom VMs, but it's a pain to do it. I would like a tool that simplifies the process."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 97 reviews while Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 4th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 36 reviews. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2, while Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Light and powerful solution design; useful to have". ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Fortinet FortiEDR, whereas Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Trellix Network Detection and Response, Check Point SandBlast Network, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Proofpoint Email Protection. See our ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.