We compared ExtremeWireless and Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: ExtremeWireless stands out for its straightforward and efficient installation process, whereas the ease and complexity of Juniper Switches can vary. ExtremeWireless is highly regarded for its dependability, scalability, and seamless integration with network fabric. On the other hand, Juniper switches are valued for their combination of hardware and software, MPLS capabilities, and user-friendly interface. However, ExtremeWireless requires regular maintenance and comes with a higher cost, while Juniper switches receive mixed feedback regarding pricing, stability, and documentation. Juniper's customer service and support receive high praise, while opinions on the quality of support for ExtremeWireless are divided.
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The solution is stable."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The wireless security solution is the most valuable feature of ExtremeWireless."
"I like Cloud IQ, ExtremeWireless' cloud controller and analytics platform. It's full of information, easy to use, and provides excellent visibility into my network."
"The technical support from Extreme Networks is perfect."
"ExtremeWireless is a flexible solution."
"The security is very good."
"In terms of the most valuable features, I like the integration with the fabric. The network fabric completely integrates with wireless as well."
"The initial setup process is simple."
"The cloud-based management system is valuable."
"The feature I like the most is the ability to reword changes before committing to the change. We can always reword changes in 10 minutes if they don't work."
"It is stable."
"It's pretty good as compared to other vendors."
"It's stable and reliable."
"Junos OS is extremely flexible and easy to pick up."
"In terms of performance, Juniper switches have a more user-friendly interface and more features than Cisco products."
"The solution is scalable. It supports my five-year expansion plan. I could expand without a problem."
"The solution has a high level of network functionality."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"The solution is expensive."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"The cost is a little high."
"The solution must include integrated IoT solutions on their wireless APs."
"The main area for improvement is the company's local visibility."
"The ability to integrate with network devices from other vendors would be helpful."
"The reports could prove in ExtremeWireless. However, we are in the early stages of use and we might be able to configure them better."
"The solution needs to improve its portfolio."
"The user interface of ExtremeWireless could be better. It is not user-friendly."
"In the next release, I would like to see more security features."
"The only issue that we have with Juniper Ethernet Switches is the firmware because it is not stable."
"The only issue that we have with Juniper Ethernet Switches is the firmware because it is not stable."
"The durability of the devices could be better."
"Juniper Ethernet Switches could improve in the EX 2300 model because it does not support IPsec VPN. Only the models at 3400 or higher support it. Additionally, there is a need for support for Mac which is lacking. Some of their competitors, such as Cisco, support Mac."
"They should integrate VPN functionality with the solution."
"We are not very pleased with their performance."
"The price is in the intermediate range. It is not overly expensive, but also not cheap. It could stand improvement."
"The stability could be better. We find, for example, Cisco, to be more stable."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →
ExtremeWireless is ranked 16th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews while Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is ranked 9th in Ethernet Switches with 65 reviews. ExtremeWireless is rated 8.0, while Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ExtremeWireless writes "An easy to deploy solution that can scale and expand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches writes "Provides campus switches and access switches that are simple to deploy, but the code isn't stable enough for a leaf and spine design". ExtremeWireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, ExtremeCloud IQ and Cisco Wireless, whereas Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is most compared with Cisco Ethernet Switches, Aruba Switches, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, Arista Networks Platform and Fortinet FortiSwitch - Data Center.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.