We performed a comparison between Fiorano ESB and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."
"The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."
"One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."
"The setup is straightforward."
"Easy connectivity and easy integration."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"Mule ESB has a user-friendly design, and everything is in one place. The API and architecture are popular right now. Also, MuleSoft has a large and supportive online community."
"The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."
"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard."
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"Scalability and load balancing."
"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."
"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."
"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."
"The payment system needs improvement."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"Mule ESB is more into the latest REST APIs, not much into the SOAP web services. Developing is all about web services and not easy with Mule."
"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution."
"Community editions need more attention."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."
"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."
Fiorano ESB is ranked 10th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 5 reviews while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Fiorano ESB is rated 9.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fiorano ESB writes "Scalable and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Fiorano ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator. See our Fiorano ESB vs. Mule ESB report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
