We performed a comparison between Flowmon and Meraki Dashboard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."
"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature is knowing the wireless and switch are healthy."
"What I love most about the Meraki Dashboard are its user-friendly features."
"Easy to configure with great troubleshooting feature."
"It's a scalable solution."
"An excellent dashboard that is currently unique in covering both SD-WAN and SD-LAN with built-in security."
"You don't have to be a network engineer to use it."
"There is no need to swap the hardware at all the locations, and importing the APs into the Dashboard was a simple and quick process."
"The dashboard itself is very simplified and easy to navigate."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."
"The licensing price could be better."
"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."
"The price could be lower because the license for access points is expensive."
"One area that could use improvement in the Meraki Dashboard is user-friendliness when navigating to port configurations."
"I am concerned about the fact that once your licensing expires the devices stop working and become a brick."
"The wait time to speak with a Meraki support engineer is always long, but they get the job done."
"What needs improvement in Meraki Dashboard is its configuration. It'll also be better if the tool has more functionality, and that is what I'd like to see in its next release."
"The tool is useful for managing devices and monitoring their current state, but it falls short in troubleshooting network issues, particularly with access points. It does not provide a complete understanding of the root causes of the issues. As a result, network engineers have had to use additional tools to complement it and conduct assessments. The only way to improve the tool would be to enhance its capability to identify and resolve network issues effectively."
"What we would like from the IT perspective is a lot more granular control, more visibility into the packets, into the routing, and things of that nature."
"There needs to be more improvement on the device-connected interface."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Flowmon is ranked 70th in Network Monitoring Software while Meraki Dashboard is ranked 9th in Network Monitoring Software with 51 reviews. Flowmon is rated 8.0, while Meraki Dashboard is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Flowmon writes "A stable and scalable solution allowing for the visibility of and the blocking of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Meraki Dashboard writes "Incredibly easy to use, great troubleshooting and prevention of malicious events". Flowmon is most compared with Darktrace, SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, WhatsUp Gold and ManageEngine OpManager, whereas Meraki Dashboard is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds NPM, ThousandEyes, Mist AI and Cloud and Zabbix. See our Flowmon vs. Meraki Dashboard report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.