We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and GTB Technologies Inspector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The feature I found most valuable is the DLP. We are using it to do encryptions."
"One of the most valuable features is the set of built-in policies that Forcepoint has for PCI compliance. We just need to activate them and start working. Without them, it would be a big task to do a data transformation."
"Scalability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten."
"After the configuration, it is very stable, and in the last two years, I haven't been faced with many issues or product-related challenges."
"Regardless of the size of your company, this solution can be scaled accurately."
"Our organization's intellectual property is not misused or extracted without permission."
"The solution’s content classification is the best."
"One of the most valuable features is being able to see file movement, where files are going. Every week we review the files. It can identify software codes, so we code files and we know where they're going and who's doing what. It gives us visibility."
"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."
"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."
"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."
"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."
"The product has a centralized console for everything."
"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."
"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."
"My opinion is that the dashboard could be improved and made more user-friendly. They do not enable a wide range of proper inquiries and we need to identify much of what we need on our own, like incident severity."
"The solution's interface is still not user-friendly for some customers. So, its interface can be better."
"The initial setup is a bit complex. You will need help from the peer support team in the configuration."
"The tool needs to integrate data classification."
"Feature requests do take some time to implement."
"There's zero Forcepoint presence in West Africa. Customers typically like having these things close to them. It would help if they had a presence here. Right now, Forcepoint West Africa has been administered from South Africa. Because of this, customers can't access premium support in our region."
"This solution has a tendency to provide false-positive results."
"With respect to the discovery component, the reports are very hard to interpret because they come out in an illogical format."
"The solution’s performance must be improved."
"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."
"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."
"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."
"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."
"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."
"The performance could be better."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while GTB Technologies Inspector is ranked 16th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 7 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while GTB Technologies Inspector is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GTB Technologies Inspector writes "Good policy creation and data protection but needs better performance". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas GTB Technologies Inspector is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.