We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The incident management and fingerprinting have been the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it captures where the data is being moved."
"I like that you can quickly create policies and enforce them in a matter of minutes."
"After the configuration, it is very stable, and in the last two years, I haven't been faced with many issues or product-related challenges."
"The initial setup process went well."
"The Forcepoint tool is well developed. It is ranked in many evaluations at the top when it comes to enterprise DLP solutions. It has good artificial intelligence that enables our customers to focus on specific incidents, instead of having a complicated list of uncategorized incidents."
"A very user-friendly predefining feature."
"We don't require a lot of downtime, but when we do then we are getting proper support with no issue."
"I really like the auditing component because it really looks at exactly what has happened on the network."
"I like the solution's feasibility. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is also better and easier to use than other ePOs."
"Technical support is very helpful."
"The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly."
"The central management console is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"From a single dashboard, I can take a look at several things including the endpoint protection, the file integrity section, the data activity monitor, and more."
"The solution's best part is that it is very easy to manage McAfee Agent."
"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."
"The solution lacks sufficient customization."
"The price could be reduced to be more cost, effective."
"There is room for improvement regarding OCR. I would like to see it enhanced to handle multiple languages and it should be easier to manage."
"The initial setup is a bit complex. You will need help from the peer support team in the configuration."
"When you automatically try to upgrade the agent it causes problems."
"They can improve a bit in the OCR category. The OCR deployment could be simplified. Right now, you have to set up a separate server to manage all the data going through the network, especially the images. Forcepoint could better integrate the OCR component with central management."
"With respect to the discovery component, the reports are very hard to interpret because they come out in an illogical format."
"You have to monitor the solution all the time."
"The solution could improve the EDR component in many areas, such as the zero-day and persistent threats. The implementation is also complex for this feature."
"The issues with the integration capabilities of the product, specifically the ones that are deployed on an on-premises model, need to be improved."
"There are some issues we are having with updating our Windows server. So we need to contact support or access our support portal."
"The impact of the agent on the endpoint's performance - the resources it takes. Additionally, the difficulties we experience with inheriting and breaking inheritance on the organization's structure breakdown for policy inheritance and then for rules inheritance. We are actually struggling with this."
"There are some issues relating to the automation of reports. That's why I wanted the DLP reports. There are some problems in this area. Sometimes it does not work even though all the configuration words are right. There are also some problems with automatic updates."
"There needs to be support for Mac computers. Currently, McAfee does not work on iOS."
"There is a problem when it comes to agent communication and duplicate records, where the rebooting of a machine leads to the installation of a new agent and you get a lot of duplicate records that ultimately affect your compliance monitoring."
"We need to consolidate multiple features into one console. It would be beneficial to have all the important features on a single platform."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 39 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Useful agent communication, reliable, but lacking support for microservices". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Zscaler DLP, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Zscaler DLP. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator report.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
