We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Trellix DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It was mostly stable."
"The integration is great."
"Our organization's intellectual property is not misused or extracted without permission."
"Forcepoint's data visibility is the most valuable feature."
"The ease of configuration was probably one of its biggest selling points."
"This solution has a great encryption feature."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it captures where the data is being moved."
"The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions."
"It prevents enterprises from installing external software and devices and can block specific network pathways."
"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."
"It is a very stable solution."
"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."
"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."
"The policy update size and agent size could be improved. We would also like to have a proper solution for Linux OS which Forcepoint does not offer."
"I would like to see improvement in the reporting. We can only get one week's worth of data; we can't get more than that. Also, the reporting console is very slow, making it very frustrating to use."
"The initial setup is a bit complex. You will need help from the peer support team in the configuration."
"I'd like the data classification to be better."
"The setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The APIs for device integration are limited, so that could be improved."
"The deployment can be difficult."
"They can improve a bit in the OCR category. The OCR deployment could be simplified. Right now, you have to set up a separate server to manage all the data going through the network, especially the images. Forcepoint could better integrate the OCR component with central management."
"Trellix needs to improve customer support."
"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."
"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."
"The support team's response time during the night is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while Trellix DLP is ranked 18th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 5 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Trellix DLP is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix DLP writes "Useful in the area of data security and is easy to deploy". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Code42 Incydr, whereas Trellix DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP). See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.