We performed a comparison between Forescout Platform and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The user interface is quite simple."
"The product is very easy to work with and easy to deploy."
"It allows for good detection of all the vendor products we have on-site."
"The most valuable feature is the blocking of USB devices."
"Being able to actively identify the client without a certificate allows you to control every device on your network regardless of the make, model, and software running. This allows for end-to-end security."
"The most valuable feature of the Forescout Platform it's highly customizable and flexible."
"Its feature that I have found most valuable is that it is very granular. You can configure granular controls just as you want those policies to be implemented. It gives you that flexibility to go granular in how you want your controls to be implemented. That's something I like about it."
"Forescout Platform has made it possible to block people working near our construction sites who should not have access to our network."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"Search - needs boolean functionality (or pseudo operand now working)."
"Forescout Platform needs to improve how the device works in preventing rogue servers."
"We experienced some detection issues when checking compliance for the Sophos agent."
"Forescout Platform's technical support is slow to respond and could be more knowledgeable."
"Can be expensive if it's only being used for one feature."
"The solution does have a bit of complexity, and there's some complexity in the deployment. Users need to be trained before undertaking an initial setup."
"The initial setup was complex."
"The product needs to improve its support. I know a case that dragged on for about one and a half years. They eventually suggested professional services and closed the ticket. We followed their advice, engaging the account manager and professional service team, only to discover that the issue was a bug. After reopening the case, it's been about six months, and the problem still hasn't been resolved."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
Forescout Platform is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 69 reviews while Ivanti NAC is ranked 13th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Forescout Platform is rated 8.4, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass and Fortinet FortiNAC. See our Forescout Platform vs. Ivanti NAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.