Froxlor Server Management Panel vs Vestacp comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Froxlor Logo
1,149 views|874 comparisons
Vesta Logo
2,919 views|2,406 comparisons
Ranking
Views
1,149
Comparisons
874
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,919
Comparisons
2,406
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Vesta Control Panel
Learn More
Froxlor
Video Not Available
Vesta
Video Not Available
Overview

The lightweight server management software for your needs.

It has the fine touch of Softaculous auto installer that is able to install more than 439 apps with one click, we hope it would be appreciated with our not so experienced users and in general will make vesta even simpler to use and to build a web site.

Sample Customers
treesaver, monovm
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider24%
Computer Software Company19%
Educational Organization11%
University8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company10%
Computer Software Company8%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise44%

Froxlor Server Management Panel is ranked 9th in Web Hosting Control Panel while Vestacp is ranked 6th in Web Hosting Control Panel. Froxlor Server Management Panel is rated 0.0, while Vestacp is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Froxlor Server Management Panel is most compared with ISPConfig, CentOS CWP, Virtualmin, cPanel and Plesk, whereas Vestacp is most compared with CentOS CWP, cPanel, Virtualmin, ISPConfig and ISPmanager.

See our list of best Web Hosting Control Panel vendors.

We monitor all Web Hosting Control Panel reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.