Fungible Storage Cluster vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fungible Logo
340 views|113 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Pure Storage Logo
966 views|582 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fungible Storage Cluster and Pure FlashArray X NVMe based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hitachi Vantara and others in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays.
To learn more, read our detailed NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to implement and configure, easy to use, and really reliable."

More Fungible Storage Cluster Pros →

"Pure has signature security technology, which cannot be deleted, even if you are an administrator.""The Pure1 component is most valuable at this point in time when comparing it with EMC. Pure1 is where you can have your diagnostics in the cloud, so you can look at things from your mobile phone.""Technical support has been helpful and responsive.""The system allows for seamless learning experiences, facilitating quick and easy cloning of environments within minutes.""Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use.""What I really like about this program, is that it is easy to use and easy to configurate.""One of the best features is the support, which is excellent.""It's helped us because we've changed fundamentally what we talk about. We don't talk about storage and different tiers of storage anymore nor do we talk about servers. We talk now about applications and how applications impact the business and end users."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Pros →

Cons
"The security and reporting could be improved."

More Fungible Storage Cluster Cons →

"In the next release, I would like to see real-time analytics for further insight into consumption models.""They could add more support for file storage and different types of storage.""I want to see Pure Storage not only be for fast storage, but I want to see it be for the entire data center.""The tool's portfolio is minimal. It is expensive.""The tool's pricing is higher than competitors.""We have run into a couple of instances recently where we are running out of space. So we have had to buy some more packs for it and they have deployed fine and it has increased smoothly.""It is on the expensive side.""We've seen that when we create a POD in synchronous mode, it increases the latency."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "With Pure Storage, we would like to continue seeing price reductions with flash storage. I don't think we're any different than anybody else when we continue to look to the industry for price reductions of both NVMe and traditional SSD storage. We would like to see these prices continue to decline and erode, even displacing large spinning disks."
  • "We pay approximately $50,000 USD per year in licensing fees."
  • "With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually."
  • "Our licensing fees are $500,000+ USD."
  • "As far as the licensing costs, everything is included in the license."
  • "They can tout the functionality and cutting edge technology that they have, but that's where the price tag comes in. The cost is high, but I think as they grow their business and get more customers that it will probably go down a little bit."
  • "Its price could be better. It is not too expensive, but it is the high-end cost. It is kind of a Rolls-Royce. You pay a lot, but you get a lot out of it. So, the price pressure on the way down would be great, but at the end of the day, if you need to do the work, you just pay for it."
  • "The licensing is on a yearly basis."
  • More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The standout features for us in Pure FlashArray X NVMe are its robust DDoS protection, seamless transparent failover, and failback capabilities ensuring high availability.
    Top Answer:I would rate the solution as an eight out of ten in terms of costliness.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in catering to midrange storage needs, especially for customers seeking Enterprise-class features. We would appreciate a built-in transparent failover in the next release… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    340
    Comparisons
    113
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    966
    Comparisons
    582
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    383
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Fungible Storage Cluster provides scale-out Cassandra deployments with an alternative to conventional storage that addresses severe infrastructure limitations to deliver flexibility, performance and value.

    Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Legal Firm12%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hitachi Vantara and others in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fungible Storage Cluster is ranked 18th in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays while Pure FlashArray X NVMe is ranked 6th in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays with 28 reviews. Fungible Storage Cluster is rated 7.0, while Pure FlashArray X NVMe is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Fungible Storage Cluster writes "Easy to implement and configure but the security and reporting could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pure FlashArray X NVMe writes "Reasonably priced, scales well, and offers good stability". Fungible Storage Cluster is most compared with , whereas Pure FlashArray X NVMe is most compared with Dell PowerStore, Dell Unity XT, HPE Nimble Storage, Pure Storage FlashArray and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform.

    See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors and best All-Flash Storage vendors.

    We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.