We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"The most valuable features are case management and integration services."
"Powerful, full-featured business process management with excellent support"
"Pega BPM has a full suite for any enterprise. It is a process orchestration platform. It has detailed features for case management and workflows."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."
"The solution has very helpful technical support."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"To learn Pega, you need to be a partner. If someone just wants to learn Pega for the sake of learning, they won't be able to do so as they don't give access to that."
"An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities. Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise."
"It should have integration with non-relational databases. A lot of databases are non-relational, and as a company, we are planning to move to NoSQL or open-source databases. It would be good if we are able to install and use Pega on a NoSQL database. They can also try to tailor or organize the company a bit differently and go more towards the microservice concept. I would like Pega to develop machine learning and intelligent AI algorithms. They have a good foundation in terms of the model and the stuff that we are using for some customers, and it will be good to onboard as many machine learning algorithms as possible."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
"There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before."
"Pega BPM can improve product management, case management, omnichannel, CDH, and the customer data hub. All the major domains can improve. Additionally, more AI functionality and proper integrations with Pega RPA would be helpful."
"The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother."
"The cost of licensing could be improved."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 8th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Mendix and OutSystems, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and ARIS BPA. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.