We performed a comparison between Google Chrome Enterprise and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It has been working pretty well for us...By and large, things are pretty stable."
"Chrome Enterprise is really easy to deploy and manage."
"Bookmarking is very good because they are synchronized across all devices."
"We use the product to run applications and devices."
"Google Chrome Enterprise is a stable solution with good performance."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Chrome functions as a comprehensive solution due to its continuous self-evaluation and improvement. The evolution process has been significant, with a notable distance covered from its inception to the present. Notably, features like VPN support have been incorporated over time, enhancing the platform's capabilities. A distinctive feature is that users don't even need to know the Wi-Fi password; upon signing into the machine, internet connectivity is established immediately. Furthermore, the cloud storage system ensures data isn't stored locally, making it seamless for users to switch between machines. In summary, Google Chrome Enterprise is an excellent solution, particularly when there's a shortage of available manpower."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance."
"We have access to the Red Hat knowledge base. We have frequent meetings with Red Hat. Red Hat partners provided us with all the information and any kind of training."
"The integrated solution approach reduces our TCO tremendously because we are able to focus on innovation instead of operations."
"Customer support is valuable."
"There are millions of commands you can use, although we use only five or ten."
"Red Hat Enterprise Linux is easy to manage, update, and integrate. I also like Red Hat Enterprise Linux's built-in security features. You need to enable them by default or keep them enabled if you want your system to be secured. It protects most of the system components."
"The Red Hat Linux comes with Anaconda, a fascinating tool that is useful if I need to connect multiple systems. I also like role-based access."
"The security of the OS is the most valuable feature."
"For us, its security, management, stability, and hardening are most valuable."
"Google Chrome Enterprise doesn't use AI in its solution."
"They need to deal with their memory management."
"Setting up anything resembling a shared inbox is still kind of a giant pain in the solution."
"The product must improve its speed."
"Identifying areas for improvement can be challenging since Chrome consistently strives to enhance itself. One aspect I'd like to highlight is virtualization. For instance, if you require desktop-based applications like Cisco or Adobe products on your local machine, Chrome's support is limited. While they offer Linux solutions for virtualization, my query or request would be to expand this to include Windows-based applications. If this were implemented, it would be a valuable enhancement, encouraging broader adoption by companies."
"Additional data security and data privacy features could be proactively recommended by Google."
"Chromebooks are hard to find in the Indonesian market."
"The product's stability can be better."
"The integration with the apps and support there could be better."
"The solution should improve its documentation."
"The solution could provide more APIs and GUI interfaces."
"Servers: More applications for monitoring (e.g., nmon)."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The numerous links to different pages disrupt the flow of information and make it difficult to maintain focus."
"Network virtualization resources could be better. When you have any kind of trouble with network virtualization, such as with OVS, which is like a switch in a virtual environment, it takes many hours to find what is happening. Other vendors, such as VMware, and even other Linux implementations for network virtualization have better resources. It is much easier to escalate, and there is better documentation."
"The accessibility to the resources could be more widespread. We have to put a lot of effort into finding indigenous information on the site. For example, the license information is convoluted. This information should be easier for customers to access."
More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Chrome Enterprise is ranked 9th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 15 reviews while Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is ranked 1st in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 167 reviews. Google Chrome Enterprise is rated 8.6, while Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Google Chrome Enterprise writes "A scalable solution that allows its users to create, share and edit documents internally within an organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) writes "Highly stable, good knowledge base, and reasonable price". Google Chrome Enterprise is most compared with Island, Avira Secure Browser, Talon, Windows 10 and Oracle Solaris, whereas Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is most compared with Windows Server, Ubuntu Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise and Windows 10. See our Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
