We performed a comparison between Google Chronicle Suite and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The platform's most valuable features are multiple connectors and data output flexibility regarding dashboards and user experience."
"Google Chronicle Suite is a highly scalable solution with good search capabilities."
"The product's most valuable feature is threat hunting. We can detect the threats directly from the console from the past data as well."
"The support team is responsive."
"Google Chronicle Suite provides useful APIs."
"What sets Chronicle apart from other solutions is its emphasis on threat hunting rather than solely serving as a monitoring tool."
"The log folder is fairly simple."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the search option, allowing easy navigation."
"It's stable."
"The product’s interface is intuitive."
"Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases."
"Wazuh offers numerous features, such as the ability to define custom rules for detecting malicious activities and remembering behaviors."
"The main thing I like about it is that it has an EDR."
"The configuration assessment and Pile integrity monitoring features are decent."
"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."
"The product is easy to customize."
"The tool is complicated for a first-time user. It should also include newer APIs."
"The tool needs to improve tasking packages. Its GUI needs to be improved. The product needs to include time-based filtration. We can only see the alert detection timeline now."
"The product's default dashboard feature has a few limitations regarding availability."
"The tool is a little bit difficult to use compared to Microsoft Sentinel."
"A few areas are difficult to understand for someone who has less experience using the product."
"In terms of improvement, the UI can be a bit challenging for beginners."
"The configuration is not optimal."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) should be more user-friendly."
"Wazuh should come up with more in-built rules and integrations for the cloud."
"They could include flexibility and customization capabilities by modifying for customers based on partner agreements."
"Its user interface for sure can be improved. It is not so comfortable to use if you're looking for specific logs."
"A lack of certain features creates limitations."
"The tool doesn't detect anomalies or new environments."
"One area where Wazuh could use some improvement is in its reporting mechanism, especially for high-level management like CSOs and CEOs."
"Scalability is a challenge because it is distributed architecture and it uses Elastic DB. Their Elastic DB doesn't allow open source waste application."
"I think that the next release should be more suitable for large enterprises, because currently they are not because large companies do not rely on open source solutions."
Google Chronicle Suite is ranked 28th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 8 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 3rd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 38 reviews. Google Chronicle Suite is rated 7.8, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Google Chronicle Suite writes "Swiftly navigates and analyzes extensive datasets without significant delays ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". Google Chronicle Suite is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, AWS Security Hub, Sentinel and Sumo Logic Security, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, AlienVault OSSIM and Graylog. See our Google Chronicle Suite vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.