We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and SAP Business One on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Google Cloud is its flexibility."
"It's easy to work with."
"It is very easy to share documents."
"The customer service team for this solution is very knowledgeable."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"It's robust, and it has a wide reach in terms of office applications including storage."
"The product scales well."
"Google Cloud is very user-friendly."
"It is well-established and caters to our user base efficiently."
"The initial setup is manageable."
"The product makes it easier to overview the ERP system and manufacturing processes through different modules."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The way we can make changes in new fields, or make new rules with our IT department, has been very useful."
"It is very flexible...It is a stable solution."
"Setting up Business One is straightforward. It took us about three months to deploy Business One on AWS."
"The initial setup of the product seems to be good."
"Could provide more services."
"My only concern is that a number of the offerings are built on their own proprietary technologies which means means that, with respect to the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."
"The documentation could be better."
"Google Cloud could improve interoperability with other cloud services."
"I feel that the Google product is incomplete with regard to internal communications. It is an area that needs some improvement."
"Google is slower to support .NET."
"Google Cloud would benefit from more detailed practical hands-on training especially in your mother tongue, not just English."
"I would like to see Google Cloud become more competitive when it comes to price."
"I would like to achieve better integration with AWS so that it becomes more interconnected with the SAP system."
"I would like SAP to replace Business One's fixed Web client with a native Web solution. Right now, their remote access is based on RVP. We have to access the solution through a Windows-based client. It's not a native Web interface."
"SAP Business One on AWS could improve by having more customization and more user-friendly automation."
"The browser access needs to improve, as everybody in the industry knows how limited it is."
"The tool's cost is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There is a need to make multiple changes in the code to make a few changes in any module of the product."
"The web client is an area with shortcomings, which SAP is presently working on, and needs to improve."
"The look-and-feel of the system is quite outdated as compared to a lot of other products out there."
Google Cloud is ranked 4th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 66 reviews while SAP Business One on AWS is ranked 5th in Cloud ERP with 23 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while SAP Business One on AWS is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Business One on AWS writes " A highly stable product with great technical support specifically designed for small and medium enterprises". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and OpenShift, whereas SAP Business One on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, NetSuite ERP, SAP Business ByDesign and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). See our Google Cloud vs. SAP Business One on AWS report.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.