We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is a valuable feature."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to spin."
"The solution is fairly easy to deploy."
"It eliminates capital expenditures and subsequent MNO that we would use to spend on on-prem architectures. That money is funneled towards security and connectivity provisioning."
"The customer service team for this solution is very knowledgeable."
"It is easy to use and has a very familiar interface."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud is its security."
"It's available any time you need it."
"It is a scalable solution if you have a good cloud infrastructure."
"The processes and the way we take advantage and use assistance are good."
"One of the features that I've found most useful is that It's very simple. They take care of the technical aspects of the data, installations, patches."
"There's a minimum amount of downtime when using the solution. This platform is very effective."
"This solution is as good as any other S/4HANA SAP solution. The continuous support we get is very valuable."
"It is a stable and scalable product."
"The BTP module is important for digital transformations."
"The solution does provide quite a lot of support, upgrades, automated batch updates, etc."
"When companies grow at a larger scale, they may shift to a different cloud services provider like AWS or Oracle."
"I feel that the Google product is incomplete with regard to internal communications. It is an area that needs some improvement."
"I would like to see an increase in storage with Google Cloud."
"I would like to see Google Cloud become more competitive when it comes to price."
"It would be nice if they could offer more free storage."
"The solution could be a bit cheaper."
"Google Cloud could improve interoperability with other cloud services."
"The price of the solution could be more transparent."
"The stability needs to be improved to be able to handle large amounts of data."
"The solution needs to embed or integrate with IBP to fully activate the PPT module with efficiency."
"They should probably offer more cloud services. Most of the cloud infrastructure providers we have make everything pretty transparent, you know what you're getting, you have all these metrics and measurements and everything in the dashboard. Here you have to go through the contracting negotiations and all those things."
"The main thing is that SAP needs to give better response times for support tickets."
"The solution is scalable from an infrastructure point of view. However, it becomes more complex over time because technology is changing so fast."
"Our data centers are in Europe and come under GDPR regulations, and this doesn't apply to the Middle East yet. It causes a lot of confusion."
"This product is not mature enough at this point in time."
"The cost could be improved. I think it's higher than the competition."
Google Cloud is ranked 4th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 66 reviews while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is ranked 8th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 21 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud writes "High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Modal Labs, whereas SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, SAP S4HANA on AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Hybris on AWS. See our Google Cloud vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.