Grafana Loki vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Grafana Labs Logo
3,362 views|2,958 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
15,094 views|9,166 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Grafana Loki and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Loki vs. IBM Security QRadar Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Grafana Loki is the dashboards which are really simple to create.""The most valuable feature of the solution is the tool's GUI. The solution's GUI is very user-friendly.""The solution's stability has never been a problem. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine to ten out of ten.""The best feature of Grafana Loki is that it integrates well with our other tool.""Loki also utilizes the same service discovery mechanism as used by Prometheus. So, whatever labeled metadata you see in Prometheus, you have the exact same metadata in the Loki system. Given this level of intricacy and the attempt to address these challenges, I firmly believe that Loki deserves praise for the work.""We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.""I appreciate the capability to process logs from microservices and seamlessly integrate them into Grafana.""The log collection feature is good and the solution is easily understandable. v"

More Grafana Loki Pros →

"Most valuable features include the granularity of information.""It is really helpful to us from the compliance point of view.""Providing real-time visibility for threat detection and prioritization - QRadar SIEM provides contextual and actionable surveillance across the entire IT infrastructure.""There are a lot of features in QRadar. App Exchange is the most valuable feature. User behavior analytics (UBA) is also a very good feature. Watson is also there, but we are not currently using Watson. It is versatile and quite easy. It also has an all-in-one-box feature and good integration with AWS.""It's user-friendly when compared to other products.""Senses, tracks, and links significant incidents and threats.""There are more than 120 extensions in QRadar, which are easy to install and configure. These can improve your analysis of events.""We can easily monitor many things using this tool."

More IBM Security QRadar Pros →

Cons
"The correlation of requests is not simple in Grafana Loki and can be improved.""We encountered certain limitations when it came to alerting, particularly when dealing with specific data sources.""We had a well-structured dashboard with a functional query. However, an issue arose when the Kubernetes pod restarted. The statistics from our Grafana query would reset, dropping to zero and starting anew. This was particularly noticeable with linear graphs, which are expected to show consistent growth.""The solution has shortcomings regarding security monitoring-oriented features that need improvement.""There is a need for some change in the alerting types of the product. In short, a few changes in the alert area are needed due to minor shortcomings.""Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other open-source visualization tools like Chronograf.""The solution's scalability depends on the team managing the Grafana instance.""My main concern is the recommended production-grade setup. They suggest using tools like Tanka or Jsonnet. They should simplify the process to increase adoption."

More Grafana Loki Cons →

"We have had problems with networking.""The solution can be improved by lowering the cost and bettering their technical support.""The biggest problem was built on top of the QRadar in the executive operations center network. The integration was not using the network security specialist properly, and all the incidents were inferior with QRadar. Its compatibility is not really good.""Each module requires a separate license and a separate cost.""Its architecture is very complicated.""There needs to be better integration with other applications.""Right now, if you look at the compatibility, if you need to deploy QRadar in a physical appliance you have only two choices of server, their own or a Lenovo server. In today's world, you cannot keep something tied to such a big brand. Clients want to be able to use whatever type of server they want.""The features that could be improved include the licensing model and the dashboards and all those presentations. Overall, the user experience part can be improved."

More IBM Security QRadar Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You can use the free version of Grafana Loki on-premises."
  • "My company doesn't need to pay for the licensing cost of the solution."
  • "We use a free version."
  • "The pricing structure varies based on the number of users; there might be specific taxes to pay for it."
  • "The solution is open source."
  • "I use the solution's open-source version. Grafana Loki is a completely free solution for me."
  • "I use the open-source version of the product."
  • "Grafana Loki is a free, open-source solution."
  • More Grafana Loki Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "found other solutions, with more features at the same cost or less. You don’t have to leave the Gartner Magic Quadrant to beat their price."
  • "Most of the time, it is easier and cheaper to buy a new product or the QRadar box."
  • "IBM's Qradar is not for small companie. Unfortunately, it would be 'overkill' to place it plainly. The pricing would be too much."
  • "IBM's Qradar is not for small companie. Unfortunately, it would be 'overkill' to place it plainly. The pricing would be too much."
  • "Go through a vulnerability assessment review for price breaks. A virtualized solution will also cut down on cost."
  • "It is expensive. It is not a product that I can provide for SMBs. It is a program that I can only provide for really large enterprises."
  • "The maintenance costs are high."
  • "Pricing (based on EPS) will be more accurate."
  • More IBM Security QRadar Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Vinod Shankar
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.
    Top Answer:Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution.
    Top Answer:There are a few features in the solution's enterprise version that are not given in the normal basic version. Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other… more »
    Top Answer:It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information… more »
    Top Answer:For tools I’d recommend:  -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also,… more »
    Top Answer:The event collector, flow collector, PCAP and SOAR are valuable.
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    3,362
    Comparisons
    2,958
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    518
    Rating
    8.1
    6th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    15,094
    Comparisons
    9,166
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    487
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar, IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson
    Learn More
    Overview

    Grafana Loki is a powerful log aggregation and analysis tool designed for cloud-native environments. Its primary use case is to collect, store, and search logs efficiently, enabling organizations to gain valuable insights from their log data.

    The most valuable functionality of Loki is its ability to scale horizontally, making it suitable for high-volume log data. It achieves this by utilizing a unique indexing approach called "Promtail," which efficiently indexes logs and allows for fast searching and filtering. Loki also supports log streaming in real-time, ensuring that organizations can monitor and analyze logs as they are generated.

    By centralizing logs in a single location, Loki simplifies log management and troubleshooting processes. It provides a unified view of logs from various sources, making it easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. With its powerful query language, organizations can extract meaningful information from logs, enabling them to gain insights into system performance, identify anomalies, and detect potential security threats.

    Loki's integration with Grafana, a popular open-source visualization tool, allows users to create rich dashboards and visualizations based on log data. This combination enhances the observability of systems and applications, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve overall operational efficiency.

    IBM Security QRadar is a security and analytics platform designed to defend against threats and scale security operations. This is done through integrated visibility, investigation, detection, and response. QRadar empowers security groups with actionable insights into high-priority threats by providing visibility into enterprise security data. Through centralized visibility, security teams and analysts can determine their security stance, which areas pose a potential threat, and which areas are critical. This will help streamline workflows by eliminating the need to pivot between tools.

    IBM Security QRadar is built to address a wide range of security issues and can be easily scaled with minimal customization effort required. As data is ingested, QRadar administers automated, real-time security intelligence to swiftly and precisely discover and prioritize threats. The platform will issue alerts with actionable, rich context into developing threats. Security teams and analysts can then rapidly respond to minimize the attackers' strike. The solution will provide a complete view of activity in both cloud-based and on-premise environments as a large amount of data is ingested throughout the enterprise. Additionally, QRadar’s anomaly detection intelligence enables security teams to identify any user behavior changes that could be indicators of potential threats. 

    IBM QRadar Log Manager

    To better help organizations protect themselves against potential security threats, attacks, and breaches, IBM QRadar Log Manager gathers, analyzes, preserves, and reports on security log events using QRadar Sense Analytics. All operating systems and applications, servers, devices, and applications are converted into searchable and actionable intelligent data. QRadar Log Manager then helps organizations meet compliance reporting and monitoring requirements, which can be further upgraded to QRadar SIEM for a more superior level of threat protection.

    Some of QRadar Log Manager’s key features include:

    • Data processing and capture on any security event
    • Disaster recovery options and high availability 
    • Scalability for large enterprises
    • SoftLayer cloud installation capability
    • Advanced threat protection

    Reviews from Real Users

    IBM Security QRadar is a solution of choice among users because it provides a complete solution for security teams by integrating network analysis, log management, user behavior analytics, threat intelligence, and AI-powered investigations into a single solution. Users particularly like having a single window into their network and its ability to be used for larger enterprises.

    Simon T., a cyber security services operations manager at an aerospace/defense firm, notes, "The most valuable thing about QRadar is that you have a single window into your network, SIEM, network flows, and risk management of your assets. If you use Splunk, for instance, then you still need a full packet capture solution, whereas the full packet capture solution is integrated within QRadar. Its application ecosystem makes it very powerful in terms of doing analysis."

    A management executive at a security firm says, "What we like about QRadar and the models that IBM has, is it can go from a small-to-medium enterprise to a larger organization, and it gives you the same value."

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Security Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise58%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise51%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Grafana Loki vs. IBM Security QRadar
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Loki vs. IBM Security QRadar and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Grafana Loki is ranked 13th in Log Management with 12 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. Grafana Loki is rated 8.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Grafana Loki writes "Effective for Logging, recovery from node failures is fast and single UI supports metrics, logs, and even tracing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Grafana Loki is most compared with Graylog, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security. See our Grafana Loki vs. IBM Security QRadar report.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.