We performed a comparison between Gurucul UEBA and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Gurucul is the ability to customize and it is on the Hadoop platform that has a lot of flexibility."
"I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS."
"The reporting feature was the key differentiator. I also liked the ability to create dynamic rules in the environment."
"A nice benefit is when we go to the process of selecting our youth cases, they go by building blocks. QRadar links it to building blocks."
"In terms of the most valuable features, the log collections and log processing mechanisms are good. They have good dashboards."
"We run 65 servers globally with just two people: an engineering person and me."
"The most valuable features of IBM Security QRadar are flexibility, IBM support, and scalability."
"Search capabilities are sufficient for most tasks."
"The pre-canned rules and reports in this product are a huge plus."
"It also has a graph that shows the traffic history. I can see what happened yesterday or today. If there's an incident, I can check the traffic behavior on QRadar."
"It's a state-of-the-art product for security information and event management (SIEM)."
"Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system."
"Gurucul can improve on the online documentation. They should educate the end users more to allow them to do everything themselves."
"It could be more stable."
"Solution has too many menus that require going to two or three sub-monitors to enter the QRadar."
"The solution lacks some maturity."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics could improve machine learning use cases because they are limited and most of the use cases are rule-based. They should develop more use cases, such as in Securonix or Exabeam because they will detect a threat. Using machine learning is mainly on the correlation rules, but if you think about Exabeam or Securonix, they detect using machine learning or machine learning-based algorithms."
"The solution is difficult to understand in the beginning and has complex management configurations that can be improved."
"They should provide more manual examples online so that I can learn it myself."
"The advanced planning management (APM) features should be included."
"I don't look at only the features and benefits; I also look at the price. It is a bit expensive when compared with other solutions. It is expensive for specific deployment topologies, and the decision-makers go for alternatives like ArcSight. It should also have more AI features or capabilities for better threat intelligence. The more it uses machine learning, the better would be the dashboard, analytics, and other things."
"Ideally we would like a mobile version so that any alert that comes in will notify us in a mobile app, or by using SMS integration."
Gurucul UEBA is ranked 11th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 3 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 198 reviews. Gurucul UEBA is rated 6.6, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Gurucul UEBA writes "Helped reduce our operational costs and increase our efficiency, but it can be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Gurucul UEBA is most compared with Exabeam Fusion SIEM, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM and Splunk User Behavior Analytics, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security. See our Gurucul UEBA vs. IBM Security QRadar report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.