HPE BladeSystem vs Super Micro SuperBlade comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
3,611 views|2,622 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Super Micro Logo
1,088 views|888 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and Super Micro SuperBlade based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The interface and dashboard are excellent and user-friendly.""Cabling complexity and volume have been reduced.""Its ease of management, consolidation, connectivity, power, and cooling are the most valuable features.""I have noticed that the solution does provide a very good ROI for companies.""They have served different needs for us from virtualized web servers to dedicated databases and application servers.""It is not expensive.""HPE BladeSystem is a scalable solution. It is a composable infrastructure which we can manage our external services. This is the one factor which I can see the server is much more suitable for the OneView console.""Remote management features are valuable."

More HPE BladeSystem Pros →

"The initial setup was straightforward.""The ability to save resource is a key feature.""I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

More Super Micro SuperBlade Pros →

Cons
"I am not sure if iLO is included or if there is a separate license. If it is not included, it should be included in the license. It is such a valuable feature especially because people are working remotely.""Non-disruptive firmware upgrades in all areas of blade technology.""There is always room for improvement everywhere with the HPE BladeSystem.""​Storage capacity could be enhanced.""The scalability is limited because you only have a 16-server by chassis.""HPE BladeSystem can improve proactive monitoring.""It would be nice if the solution were cheaper.""The latest version of this system is called Synergy from HPE, and it comes with more advanced features. This is currently the most advanced solution available in the market. One of its key features is its energy efficiency, which optimizes energy usage."

More HPE BladeSystem Cons →

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now.""There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added.""The solution does not scale well."

More Super Micro SuperBlade Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Their licensing program is pretty simple."
  • "With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."
  • "The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."
  • "Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."
  • "​The price could be cheaper."
  • "The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."
  • "It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."
  • "It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."
  • More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
    Top Answer:I think the IPMI is a really good feature.
    Top Answer:The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of… more »
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,611
    Comparisons
    2,622
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    400
    Rating
    8.9
    7th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    1,088
    Comparisons
    888
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    367
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
    SuperBlade
    Learn More
    Overview
    HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.
    Super Micro's SuperBlade blade servers offer many unique advantages that differentiate it from competitors' blade products and traditional rack-mount solutions. Customer benefits include maximum density, affordability, reduced management costs, lower power consumption, optimal ROI, and high scalability - and in most applications, blade servers would reduce system acquisition costs. While other blade suppliers only offer general-purpose blade servers, the SuperBlade family enables full optimization for a wide array of mission-critical and compute-intensive applications. With in-house design engineering agility to accommodate customer needs rapidly, SuperBlade revolutionizes modular computing architecture by offering several advanced application-optimized models such as Enterprise Blade Server, Data Center Optimized Blade, Workstation Blade and Office Blade.
    Sample Customers
    EMIS Health
    Prace
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 134 reviews while Super Micro SuperBlade is ranked 7th in Blade Servers with 4 reviews. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6, while Super Micro SuperBlade is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Super Micro SuperBlade writes "Easy to set up with good technical support but does not scale well". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Dell PowerEdge M and HPE Superdome X, whereas Super Micro SuperBlade is most compared with HPE Integrity, Pure Storage FlashBlade, Dell PowerEdge M, Cisco UCS B-Series and Cisco UCS E-Series Servers.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.