We performed a comparison between HPE Enterprise Routers and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"It makes it easy to update the network technology and manage multiple deals, all without needing technical knowledge."
"It has good scalability."
"Extensive support for cellular range for Wi-Fi technologies"
"These routers help us to provide high availability to our clusters."
"HPE routers are easier to manage than any other router I've used."
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."
"It is more durable than other products in the market."
"The most valuable feature is the standard routing protocol."
"In our company, we are integrators who create solutions for our customers. I find Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches to be suitable as it allows for easy configuration and offers features like SNMP. Personally, I find it convenient to switch from Cisco to Juniper EX because of my experience with various vendors like Huawei and Cisco. It's easy for me to read configurations from Cisco and transfer them to Juniper. Mainly, we work with customers who want to change or upgrade their network infrastructure, moving from vendors like Cisco, Aruba, or Huawei to Juniper for modernization. Juniper's features are more advanced, and it helps us meet the diverse needs of our customers. My role involves helping with the deployment and configuration of switching, access points, and Wi-Fi, for building robust and modern networks."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers is very flexible."
"Juniper's custom Trio chipset drives their MX routers, offering superior performance. Juniper's design separates the control plane and the forwarding plane, which is a key aspect of their architecture. This separation provides high throughput, maintaining line-rate performance across the MX platform."
"The solution's main features are its security and ease of use."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. We never had any issues."
"I would say it is very user-friendly."
"The flexibility of the MPLS configuration is very good."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I'd like to see more security features, like support for different types of encryptions."
"They should work on lowering their prices in Brazil to stay competitive with rivals and offer customers more affordable options."
"Compatibility with other platforms could be improved."
"The solution is expensive."
"Its customer service could be better for older equipment models."
"Technical support could be better."
"Better management tools are needed."
"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."
"The security features could be better."
"We'd appreciate it if they had a better GUI. It would be more flexible for the customers that way."
"Currently, I don't have specific concerns or ideas for improvement. Regarding functionalities, I appreciate the user interface of Juniper Elite. Additionally, I'm exploring the use of Juniper Routers in a Parliament environment, particularly with Baragon, and so far, I find it to be a valuable feature. We're currently facing an issue as we're in the process of building and dealing with the software, specifically transitioning from R2 to RC. It's like when there is an update in the routers, and in the process, there are chances to end up losing some of your settings. The challenge arises because the recommended configurations for RC do not align with our features, necessitating a reevaluation of many features. It would have been more efficient if the initial recommendation had been for RC, avoiding the need to redo our research. This has resulted in a loss of time for us, and we've encountered this situation multiple times."
"The only thing that might need improvement would be the occasional downtime."
"We'd like them to be capable of adding firewall options to the license."
"In terms of what could be improved, they could extend the software warranty to be for its lifetime, as well. At the moment, the software warranty is limited, I think to one year."
"Better documentation to assist with implementation would be helpful."
HPE Enterprise Routers is ranked 8th in Routers with 7 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. HPE Enterprise Routers is rated 8.2, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HPE Enterprise Routers writes "Durable and reliable with good networking capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". HPE Enterprise Routers is most compared with Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Routers and Switches and Cisco Cloud Services Router, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch. See our HPE Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.