We performed a comparison between HPE Ethernet Switches and Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Ethernet Switches solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is scalable."
"We use HPE Ethernet Switches to provide solutions for the hotel, their guests, and IPTV."
"These switches are very stable, to date I have not experienced any issues."
"It is a scalable solution."
"They are affordable and very stable. They also have good performance."
"We can easily replace components without incurring significant costs in an error or failure."
"The scalability is very good."
"We have scaled it without any issues."
"The solution has a high level of network functionality."
"It is stable."
"I like that it's fairly easy to implement these ethernet switches."
"Juniper Ethernet Switches are high-end solutions."
"What I like most about this solution is that it is secure."
"The Virtual Chassis, because you have a centralized administration of a set of switches which makes the operation more efficient."
"The campus switches and access switches are the most valuable and simple to deploy for Virtual Chassis."
"I would rate this solution a 10 out of 10 for scalability."
"Configuration can be complex."
"The security of the solution always has room for improvement."
"In the next release, I would like to see them include more features like the Aruba solution, to have more possibilities concerning the software design."
"This solution needs to support software-defined networking."
"The solution could be more stable."
"The solution is very comparable to Huawei, however, it could be more scalable. Huawei is easier to scale."
"The solution would be easier to set up if its GUI could improve or if it had a wizard."
"The solution's throughput should be increased because we often get stuck when it comes to IPTV streaming."
"The solution is a bit costly compared to other products."
"The updates are constantly breaking."
"Stability could be better, especially during a reboot. We have had some issues recently with the software getting corrupt on reboot, which causes a lot of downtime."
"It was very difficult to get technical support, here in Egypt. There is no local support available."
"More security could be provided, especially with the rising cyber-attacks in business organizations."
"Has a steep learning curve."
"The stability could be better. We find, for example, Cisco, to be more stable."
"The protocols can be tunneled, but on a global basis, not on an interface, and this is a feature that should be added."
More Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →
HPE Ethernet Switches is ranked 11th in Ethernet Switches with 96 reviews while Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is ranked 9th in Ethernet Switches with 65 reviews. HPE Ethernet Switches is rated 8.2, while Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Ethernet Switches writes "Allows to monitor all the switches online so we can see what is happening and offers good security features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches writes "Provides campus switches and access switches that are simple to deploy, but the code isn't stable enough for a leaf and spine design". HPE Ethernet Switches is most compared with Cisco Ethernet Switches, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, H3C Ethernet Switches, Meraki MS Switches and Huawei Ethernet Switches, whereas Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches is most compared with Cisco Ethernet Switches, Aruba Switches, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, Arista Networks Platform and Meraki MS Switches. See our HPE Ethernet Switches vs. Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches report.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.