We performed a comparison between HyperScience and IQ Bot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Has algorithms that can detect a document template even if the image has a lot of distortions."
"What I liked more about HyperScience was the quality of the OCR it is a lot better compared to Google."
"One of the most valuable features of HyperScience is the user-training module. Whenever the extraction takes place, based on the way we have trained HyperScience, it would give us some success status or a certain confidence level. If the solution has processed something that it determined was not extracted correctly it will queue those items for manual review."
"It provides the best accuracy for handwritten forms, which is a struggle in the industry. You can take processes with a lot of manual work and streamline them through this tool."
"I like that compared to other tools, HyperScience works best with handwritten documents."
"Valuable features include tools like IQ Bot and the ability to extract handwritten documents with 93-95 per cent accuracy."
"We have seen pretty good accuracy."
"The ability to train itself is a good, valuable feature. It is one of the most stable RPA products at present. Installation is easy for IQ Bot, and they provide good technical support."
"Good templates means that all basics are pre-defined."
"The extraction feature is the most valuable one of IQ Bot."
"IQ Bot uses AI technology to extract data from PDF files by analyzing and splitting a particular PDF file into separate groups."
"We have been using it only for two months, and so far, it is working fine. It is easy to use."
"IQ Bot efficiently extracts invoice data from various types of PDFs."
"I would say that the best feature is that it has native automation for the US."
"The most valuable feature of IQ Bot is the Discovery Bots. They can detect and analyze for improvements."
"The solution lacks support for a greater range of languages."
"HyperScience has less capability while working on unstructured forms. Unstructured forms are those where there is no standard structure and the information can be anywhere on the form. They need to develop this capability."
"HyperScience could improve the unstructured data extraction feature."
"The product's usability could be better. The first pain point is that we're getting the output in a different format, and we were expecting a different timetable. The second point is that if you want better results, HyperScience says you have to configure a minimal PDF or a maximum of 400 PDFs. If you want results with 400 PDFs for what's written by these doctors, then you also configure the maximum of 400 templates for that. So, it's essentially a lack of support from HyperScience. In the next release, it would be better if failure scenarios were reduced. It would also help if they offered different formats, inputs or injections, and added different scenarios."
"Extracting tables from certain documents could be improved."
"No solution is perfect and there are several different scenarios that could be improved in HyperScience. One area is where there are multiple tables in the same form I have seen HyperScience struggle. There is some issue with supporting the extraction from multiple tables involved on the same form. If this could improve, it would be a big benefit."
"They could work on the price and make it a bit more reasonable."
"I know that Automation Anywhere just said that IQ Bot 11 and higher versions are ready to extract the documents with less than 300 DPI, however, this is not true. I never could work with documents with less than 300 DPI."
"The quality of the service needs to be improved."
"There should be built-in or native intelligent processing capabilities."
"The price of IQ Bot, packaged with Automation Anywhere, is too expensive for some companies and they will not use it."
"The first place it could be improved is its price - it is too high. I'm having a lot of difficulty moving it to the customers."
"It's not intuitive from a user standpoint."
"This solution could be improved by making it possible to add handwriting and signatures."
"The solution requires 32GB RAM."
HyperScience is ranked 6th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 7 reviews while IQ Bot is ranked 3rd in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 48 reviews. HyperScience is rated 7.6, while IQ Bot is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of HyperScience writes "It has a lot of functionality, whatever we use, but a few things could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IQ Bot writes "User-friendly and code reusability feature for efficient utilization of existing code repositories". HyperScience is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, UiPath, Instabase, Microsoft Power Automate and Tungsten RPA, whereas IQ Bot is most compared with ABBYY Vantage and UiPath Document Understanding. See our HyperScience vs. IQ Bot report.
See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors.
We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.