We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Security and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Akamai, Cisco and others in Cloud and Data Center Security."The interface is good and very user-friendly."
"Integrations are quite a useful and key feature of this solution. It has integration with the CVSS score, which is a central point for all the data and scores about the threats. There is an IBM Bluemix dashboard that is integrated with the CVSS score."
"It'll get you from point A to B."
"It is the core of our entire SOX."
"The playbook engine is flexible and allows for the graphical visualization of processes, enabling the implementation of dynamic playbooks for incident response or testing."
"The most valuable features are the versatility of this solution and the variety of things you can do with it."
"The threat protection network is the most valuable feature, because when you get an offense, you can actually trace it back to where it originated from, how it originated, and why."
"IBM Qradar's ability to simplify the number of events, not only on a technical level but by making that information easy to pan through the orchestration deduplication. It is very impressive given that we have hundreds of devices that send event logs through."
"I like that it's easy to use and the performance is good."
"Lacks sufficient technical support."
"There are areas in IBM Security QRadar that could benefit from improvement. Its ability to customize knowledge for specific purposes could be enhanced. Also, it lacks clarity in presenting details. It is also difficult to see the reports."
"It needs more resilience and functionality."
"IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson could be more user-friendly. You need some skills and understanding of what you're looking at, especially if you're going to draw down specific information."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"The implementation of the solution's technology needs to be simplified."
"IBM Qradar could improve the reporting. The tool is not designed to report. It's a great operational monitoring tool. You put it on a screen and you watch it. If you want to have analytics out of it, that's a whole different story. You're going to need more people and tools. What should be added is reporting and integration into Power BI, into some capability that produces analytical reports from the source data. IBM does not seem to care to add these features."
"I would like to see more integration in place after the security lock."
"In a future release, the solution could provide malware analysis."
IBM Cloud Pak for Security is ranked 22nd in Cloud and Data Center Security with 1 review while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Security is rated 0.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Security writes "Great user-friendly interface; provides many functionalities and many free applications ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". IBM Cloud Pak for Security is most compared with IBM Resilient, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.