IBM Planning Analytics vs SAP Crystal Reports comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
2,274 views|1,333 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
3,386 views|2,687 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Planning Analytics and SAP Crystal Reports based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Performance Management Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Navigating through the data to make analysis is really quick.""The tool is flexible.""A lot of the platform is in-memory, so Planning Analytics can run calculations quite fast. It also offers several user interfaces. And in the newest version of Planning Analytics, there is a new one called the Planning Analytics Workspace. Maybe it could be useful for the business side.""Planning Analytics' best features include automatic updates and slicing.""The ease of use is valuable. The fact that it's plugged into Excel spreadsheets is also valuable. It provides additional functionality where you can slice and dice the information in a way that you can't do with spreadsheets""The product's stability is good.""The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.""It's a very stable, robust product."

More IBM Planning Analytics Pros →

"We use SAP Crystal Reports for operational reporting.""It is an user-friendly solution.""The initial setup of the solution is pretty easy.""The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a fantastic way of generating reports.""The most valuable feature is that from a user's point of view, it is easy to use and requires just a simple click to generate a report.""SAP Crystal Reports offers a plethora of features, many of which were available much earlier than in the Crystal Reports we previously used. We extensively use its capabilities for generating general reports, working with Kaspersky data, and even incorporating images into our reports. The range of functions available in SAP Crystal Reports is diverse, and we leverage them across various systems for our needs.""I find Crystal Reports very easy to use, even for a non-technical person."

More SAP Crystal Reports Pros →

Cons
"The tool's transport layer could be improved when promoting development between environments.""It would have been better if the solution was not just a tool kit.""It's wonky, and not super user-friendly with Excel.""Planning Analytics could be improved by adding automation features.""The dashboard is very poor and needs a lot of improvement.""It's highly competitive right now, and all the vendors are in a race to put out new versions with additional features. IBM comes out with new versions too often, and it has an impact on quality.""Adding predefined templates could be beneficial.""The local authentication part is difficult to manage in the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

More IBM Planning Analytics Cons →

"It has significantly enhanced security features, especially when compared to the standard security features of the earlier PeerSpot version I purchased. I've observed improvements in security, and overall, it's quite commendable. Regarding potential enhancements for the next release of this solution, I haven't closely examined SAP Crystal Reports 53. I've only encountered it briefly, perhaps once or twice. However, I anticipate that it likely offers advanced features distinct from its predecessor. I believe there may be notable improvements and additions in the latest version, and I look forward to exploring them further.""The financing part needs improvement.""SAP Crystal Reports has some compatibility issues with third-party products.""SAP Crystal Reports should provide better support for dynamic connectors.""There could be improvements made to the analytics capabilities.""If at all possible, a little bit of improvement on the analytical side is needed.""A real improvement would be a simpler system that allows users to play with the visualization without needing specialized skills and code."

More SAP Crystal Reports Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."
  • "The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."
  • "It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."
  • "IBM Planning Analytics is not the cheapest solution, but it's priced per the market standard for this type of solution. I rate the price at seven out of ten."
  • "I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten since it's expensive."
  • "IBM Planning Analytics is priced well, and licensing costs are yearly."
  • "Compared with the other tools in the market, IBM Planning Analytics is a bit expensive."
  • More IBM Planning Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This product costs a lot of money."
  • "I feel that SAP Crystal Reports is a reasonably priced product."
  • "We pay fifteen hundred dollars as licensing fee."
  • "The cost of licensing can be a significant factor to consider when upgrading or transitioning to a new version of SAP Crystal Reports. It's important to evaluate the benefits and features offered by the new version against the associated costs to ensure it aligns with your organization's needs and budget."
  • "SAP Crystal Reports is a very expensive solution."
  • More SAP Crystal Reports Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.
    Top Answer:The cost of IBM Planning Analytics is not cheap, considering the amount of money involved. However, it offers good ROI for customers.
    Top Answer:To improve IBM Planning Analytics, adding predefined templates could be beneficial. These templates could cover various business areas like volume planning, service levels, and more. Specific… more »
    Top Answer:SAP Crystal Reports should provide better support for dynamic connectors. The solution should export reports to Excel in a real Excel format and not in a paper-oriented way. The solution should… more »
    Top Answer:We were dedicated to Crystal Reports, and now they have shifted to SAP reports. While both functionalities are similar, there might be some enhancements or additional features to look forward to in… more »
    Top Answer:We use SAP Crystal Reports for operational reporting.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,274
    Comparisons
    1,333
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    325
    Rating
    9.2
    9th
    out of 49 in Reporting
    Views
    3,386
    Comparisons
    2,687
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

    Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

    Turn information from almost any data source into a sophisticated, interactive report with SAP Crystal Reports. This powerful, user-friendly application for small businesses and departments can help you deliver key insights to the right decision maker, at the right time, in the right format. 

    Click here for a free trial

    Sample Customers
    ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services
    City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International (ARI), LivePerson, Coelba (Grupo Neoenergia), RZD Russian Railways, National Basketball Association - NBA, TALLY WEiJL, El Machetazo, Young Heroes, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI) , Surgutneftegas Open Joint Stock Company, The VELUX Group, AOK Bundesverband, AL-KO KOBER GROUP
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Non Tech Company13%
    Real Estate/Law Firm13%
    Leisure / Travel Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization43%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Construction Company8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise42%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Performance Management
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: June 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Planning Analytics is ranked 5th in Business Performance Management with 22 reviews while SAP Crystal Reports is ranked 9th in Reporting with 48 reviews. IBM Planning Analytics is rated 8.6, while SAP Crystal Reports is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Planning Analytics writes "Can easily create dashboards and helps businesses improve forecasting accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Crystal Reports writes "Helps analyze your data by creating richly formatted, pixel-perfect, and multiple reports from virtually any data source, delivered in over a dozen formats". IBM Planning Analytics is most compared with SAP Analytics Cloud, Microsoft Power BI, Anaplan, Jedox and IBM Cognos, whereas SAP Crystal Reports is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, TIBCO Jaspersoft, Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services, IBM Cognos and Tableau.

    We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.