We performed a comparison between IBM PowerVM and VMware Workstation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."PowerVM is perhaps the only virtualization platform that offers 99.999% availability."
"The tool's performance is top-notch."
"You can increase resources with it automatically."
"The stability is the most valuable aspect of this solution. IBM is the most powerful and stable platform."
"The most valuable features in this solution are you do not get degradation in the performance like you could get in other solutions. There is a physical adapter that is better than a virtual one and you can assign adapters to a VM."
"Technical support is great."
"IBM PowerVM's most valuable feature is stability."
"It is a stable solution with reliable performance."
"We are able to simultaneously run multiple operating systems in a single machine and have virtually no performance hit."
"It's stable."
"The performance is good."
"VMware Workstation allows multiple operating systems in the same physical machine."
"The initial setup is simple and takes only five minutes to complete."
"VMware Workstation’s most valuable features are backup and data transfer from one server to another."
"The features are good."
"The product works well."
"The interface is not user-friendly in places, so it could use some improvement."
"PowerVM's platform build and performance could be improved."
"Automatic LPM is an area that is currently not available in IBM PowerVM, and it is a feature I want to see in the product's future releases."
"The hardware licensing model could be improved because the licensing model is a bit different from the standard hardware procured."
"The performance should be improved."
"The cost of this solution is high."
"Any improvements that can be made in the interface will go a long way to helping us work better."
"The program has very limited solutions for the virtualization of containers"
"VMware Workstation has some network limitations which could improve, it is not as flexible as VMware NSX. Additionally, it could support operating systems better. I only run some Linux versions and Windows at the moment but it would be nice to be able to take whatever operating system you want and run it."
"The solution can be expensive."
"The solution freezes sometimes."
"The product’s virtual machine data backup feature needs upgrading."
"I have had issues with the virtual network adapters in the past that has taken some time to troubleshoot."
"I would want to see features included that make deployment easier."
"VMware Workstation uses more resources like CPU and disk space, especially the CPU, which is a shortcoming that needs improvement."
"It could have more platforms and CPUs."
IBM PowerVM is ranked 9th in Server Virtualization Software with 28 reviews while VMware Workstation is ranked 2nd in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) with 42 reviews. IBM PowerVM is rated 8.4, while VMware Workstation is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of IBM PowerVM writes "A stable system for high-end data processing with a great support structure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workstation writes "An easy-to-manage solution that has really good customer support compared to other market players". IBM PowerVM is most compared with VMware vSphere, Hyper-V, KVM, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) and Proxmox VE, whereas VMware Workstation is most compared with Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, VMware Fusion, KVM and Proxmox VE.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.