We performed a comparison between IBM Rational DOORS and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."The next-generation features are good."
"The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements."
"The most valuable feature is the management verification and login."
"I would say that the best feature of the solution is that since everything is in one place, and if you make any changes, then they are recorded or tracked."
"I like the way we can simply link requirements with one another and with test descriptions and then automatically produce reports that are required to show compliance to our customers. It is a combination of requirements management and reporting that I like, but I really have very little to do with the reporting part of it. I don't know how easy or hard it is to create those reports."
"This product can help improve how your organization proceeds through solution development."
"Starting to use the solution is pretty straightforward. There isn't too much of a learning curve."
"It is very customizable and easy to scale."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."
"I think there is probably room to improve by offering free training."
"It would be nice if it could be scaled-down so that it could be installed and implemented without much learning or training."
"Rational DOORS' most valuable feature is that you can write any kind of requirement you want."
"The kind of dashboard is not very convenient."
"Both the performance and the price could be improved."
"There are problems with communicating between DOORS and Microsoft Office."
"The performance could be improved. It doesn't run as smoothly as it could."
"The web application DOORS Web Access doesn't have the same functionality as the standard client, so it's not a real substitute. For example, web Access only provides writing requirements, but you can't do much more with it."
"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."
IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 51 reviews while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. IBM Rational DOORS is rated 8.0, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes " Offers ability to automate tasks and to track changes within documents and compare different versions of requirements but modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector writes "A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability". IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with Polarion Requirements, Jira, Jama Connect, Helix ALM and 3SL Cradle, whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with Jira and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.