We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Logsign Next-Gen SIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has improved my efficiency."
"The visibility it gives you into your infrastructure has been great."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"This solution provides me with various alarms, and I have found security issues with some of my other products."
"On the back-end, Watson helps me figure out an exact problem, sometimes giving me the result."
"Customer service is very good and very helpful."
"The initial setup is not complex or difficult."
"One very useful feature is the plug-in offering that allows you to integrate it with other solutions, such as integrating it with plug-ins like Scout, Carbon Black, and the rest."
"The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."
"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."
"The whole process for support is something that needs to be improved."
"The technical support can be improved a little bit, and the price could be cheaper."
"It would be better if it were more stable and more secure. The price for maintenance could be better. It's too high. In the next release, I think they should focus on the price and the operation."
"IBM technical support is always terrible."
"You can scale IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, but it has room for improvement."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the script which we have to create for custom actions. QRadar needs to improve that feature. Additionally, QRadar has to provide the playbooks designing features."
"We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow."
"The solution should include remote action capabilities."
"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."
"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is ranked 39th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 3 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM writes "Easy to use and find the features that you need". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, Logpoint, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer and Sematext Logs. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.