We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found IBM QRadar to be stable."
"The solution is relatively easy to use."
"IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the DSM Editor. The custom parsing tool is very nice, outstanding."
"It is very stable. We have not faced interruptions in the past four and a half years."
"It helps us discover any threats with their alerts and tracking."
"It has a powerful GUI where you can put together your use cases, and don't have to write your own scripts."
"We find predictive analysis capabilities valuable."
"The reporting features are noteworthy, as they provide templates that streamline the process of generating reports"
"The user interface is very good."
"The most valuable features of ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer are the number of capabilities, file integration monitoring, web server log collection, and alert configuration."
"I have made use of technical support and am certainly very satisfied with them."
"The tool's reports show activities."
"It is stable."
"The initial setup is straightforward"
"What I found most useful in ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is its integration with other ManageEngine applications. It seamlessly integrates throughout the ManageEngine suite, and that's beneficial. I also like that the solution has chain management capabilities, it has a modular approach, and it's easy to reach the support team."
"Integration could be better. They should make it easy to integrate with other solutions."
"There needs to be better integration with other applications."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"The solution should enhance its capabilities of UEBA and AI/ML tech modeling."
"I have noticed the interface has room for improvement."
"Solution has too many menus that require going to two or three sub-monitors to enter the QRadar."
"Technical support could be improved by a bit."
"Do your research before implementing it, because it is tough to implement."
"I would like to see more detailed reports."
"The solution should improve on its log capturing capabilities."
"The customization of reports could be a lot easier. It is not difficult but it could be made easier."
"The scalability is limited."
"It may not be as easy to use as Splunk."
"The first tier of customer service and support is not great."
"The solution is stable. However, there are limits. For example, we can do 2,500 Syslog events per second, but if we want to do more we have to install the distributor structure, and then we can expand how many events we can do. They could improve the stability."
"Support could improve to make the solution better."
More ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is ranked 21st in Log Management with 11 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer writes "Modular software that seamlessly integrates with other applications and provides good technical support". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is most compared with ManageEngine Log360, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, Wazuh, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server and Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.