We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and VMware Aria Operations for Logs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found IBM QRadar to be scalable."
"There is a single dashboard that gives us a complete overview of what is happening around the globe."
"IBM Qradar's ability to simplify the number of events, not only on a technical level but by making that information easy to pan through the orchestration deduplication. It is very impressive given that we have hundreds of devices that send event logs through."
"This is a good tool to have because it gives you the ability to track what is currently happening in your environment."
"It showed us where weaknesses were in our environment, so we could actively target those patches first."
"It protect us from multiple authentication values, unauthorized access and antivirus threats."
"It has very rich functionality."
"The most valuable thing about QRadar is that you have a single window into your network, SIEM, network flows, and risk management of your assets. If you use Splunk, for instance, then you still need a full packet capture solution, whereas the full packet capture solution is integrated within QRadar. Its application ecosystem makes it very powerful in terms of doing analysis."
"One of the most valuable features of vRealize Log Insight is that it gives you a clear forecast about your existing machines, for example, how long your machines could be supported and how long the remaining capacity is to host your machines. This is one of the best options available within vRealize Log Insight. Another valuable feature of the solution is automation. My company deploys a lot of automation when required in a very, very short period, and in a very uniform manner, and even if the automation is being deployed for different processes and departments, it's pretty much the same across the environment, so vRealize Log Insight helps reduce a lot of ambiguities and helps my company manage operational efficiencies well."
"It is very scalable and can handle a large workload."
"It is a very useful tool if you have a VMware environment."
"It gives the customer a quick overview, so they don't have to dig. There's a clear dashboard with many sensors in a single space. He gets a helicopter view of his environment, but he can investigate further if there are serious issues. It's pretty user-friendly."
"Log Insight correlates with the VMware product log. It can assemble the logs you want, making it easier to find the output, incident, or keyword you want to search."
"The system's management and its alerts are the most valuable aspects of the solution."
"What I like is that you can have different storage locations for different applications."
"The solution's simplicity, flexibility, and extensibility are valuable features as we can integrate everything in vRealize."
"IBM QRadar could improve the plugins and threat detection."
"The AI engine could be smarter."
"The product can be a bit complex."
"I would like to see more integration in place after the security lock."
"The solution is difficult to understand in the beginning and has complex management configurations that can be improved."
"I would also like to see more integration with other vendors. IBM doesn't integrate well with products from China, like Huawei. Many Middle Eastern customers are switching to Huawei from American vendors like Cisco because of the price. In most RFPs, Huawei wins because it costs less."
"There needs to be better integration with other applications."
"The implementation and configuration are not easy."
"The solution is a very good tool, but it has a lot of limitations. One of the main issues is around how you define your retention policy, for instance, in Log Insight. It doesn't have it. You can't define a log retention policy. You also can't define the destination or location for your logs. All of the logs are in one index or one bucket."
"The tool does not provide a centralized pane for monitoring."
"The solution isn't user-friendly for admins."
"Paid or free does not matter, but it is complex to find good training material for vRealize Log Insight."
"Integration with other vendors is something that could be improved, they could add more vendors."
"The tool is expensive."
"In vRealize login files, we have limitations regarding log partitions."
"They should improve their web interface to make it more user-friendly."
More VMware Aria Operations for Logs Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while VMware Aria Operations for Logs is ranked 10th in Log Management with 24 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while VMware Aria Operations for Logs is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Aria Operations for Logs writes "Gives a clear forecast about existing machines, and has an automation feature that helps in reducing a lot of ambiguities and managing operational efficiencies". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Logs is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Elastic Security, LogRhythm SIEM, Graylog and Datadog. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. VMware Aria Operations for Logs report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.