We performed a comparison between IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and SolarWinds NPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
"The benefit of this solution is the reporting. We're able to report on and see our network in a graphical form. We are able to detect when a device is added to a network."
"With just three modules, I can monitor server performance (whether it’s a VM, in the cloud, or an on-premises server."
"The alerting and usage tracking notifications on disk space capacity, network and processor utilization."
"I like SolarWinds support because it's 24/7. You describe your issues, your situation and maybe two or three hours later you can discuss a solution with a technical engineer."
"The other valuable system is the DSS (decision support system). If there's a fault in the network, SolarWinds is basically capable of rectifying and resolving that problem on its own without any intervention from an IP assistant or administrator."
"The product covers our needs for the basic care and feeding of servers, whether they are physical or virtual."
"What I've found most valuable about the solution is that it's scalable."
"There are a lot of options for customization of the dashboard, alerts, and reports."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
"We'd like to see a bit more automation in the future."
"SolarWinds NPM could improve the graphics of the interface and more customized reporting."
"My team has had a lot of issues with support."
"They have had a rather large security breach in the past. It's cost some companies customers."
"The only real caveat that we have or that I have an issue with is when I go on vacation, it's a little hard for me to go and modify alerts so that I don't get alerted about things when I'm on vacation."
"Being able to detect devices that are trying to connect wirelessly would make using this solution much easier."
"GUI needs improvement with a more graphical dashboard."
"The reporting module that got integrated into the system itself, used to be a standalone solution and I preferred that."
More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is ranked 51st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 5 reviews while SolarWinds NPM is ranked 4th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 147 reviews. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds NPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor writes "It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds NPM writes "High-level, comprehensive, and proactive monitoring in a user-friendly interface". IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is most compared with , whereas SolarWinds NPM is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, ManageEngine OpManager, ThousandEyes and Entuity. See our IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. SolarWinds NPM report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.