We performed a comparison between IIS and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use and easy to understand."
"It helps scan and mitigates our vulnerabilities using the best protocols to secure our environment."
"The solution is very simple to use and easy to deploy."
"The solution is simple and very easy to manage compared to Linux."
"The product is easy to configure."
"The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use."
"IIS is easy to configure in terms of websites and other solutions."
"It has an intuitive user interface and provides a lot of options for building reports."
"As we are a software company, we find that accessing resources using this technology is easier compared to the others."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The solution is not limited in storage, is customizable and simple to use."
"It is a stable solution."
"The technology is very scalable and accessible to use."
"The addition of generics to handle common functionality across types, and the more recent upgrade of the dataset to the Entity Framework, has cut development time drastically, while increasing quality and confidence between builds."
"The tool offers a lot of support, and there is a lot of knowledge material available, along with a lot of community groups."
"The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution."
"The price of the solution could be less to improve."
"IIS could improve the error logging. There are times we are not able to see the errors. More details would be helpful. Additionally, the configuring of the IIS should be allowed through coding instead of the classic view."
"IIS has some stability issues and needs restarting."
"Scalability issues and security concerns need attention from Microsoft."
"The customer service and support team can be improved."
"The solution's black box is not fast."
"The platform's stability could be better."
"The integration capability of the product with AI is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"Microsoft .NET Framework has a steep learning curve, which could be improved."
"This solution should include Power BI so that we don't have to use any third-party tools."
"In the next release, I am looking for more advanced technologies such as socket communication and enhanced features like realtime chat with the clients."
"I would like to see a better response time from the technical support."
".NET Is still heavy or dependant on other Microsoft libraries and frameworks."
"In the realm of Microsoft .NET Framework, particularly in the C# language, there have been significant developments that I find highly commendable. I am genuinely fascinated by the continuous evolution of the language, and staying abreast of the latest features in Azure is both challenging and enjoyable. Working with C# in Azure is particularly fantastic. I appreciate in .NET, as compared to Java, is the enforcement of types, providing a better experience in terms of technicalities. Additionally, the introduction of Roslyn in the past few years has brought about the concept of late .NET, which I find interesting and powerful. This allows for the transformation of symbolic code just before execution, eliminating the runtime decision-making process and enhancing efficiency. However, late .NET does come with a drawback – a delay in the last-minute computation when starting an executable. While some may find this less appealing in terms of instant responsiveness, especially in serverless cloud environments, the efficiency gained from executing strictly binary code is valuable. Despite potential drawbacks like the time required for activation, I view .NET favorably for its technical advancements and efficiency, especially in scenarios such as serverless cloud computing. It's essential to recognize the intricacies of how .NET processes code and the efficiency it brings, which some may overlook."
"The integration could improve in Microsoft .NET Framework."
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and IBM WebSphere Application Server, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server, Windows Process Activation Services and IBM WebSphere Application Server. See our IIS vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.