We performed a comparison between Imperva SecureSphere Database Security and jSonar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security are the user-friendliness, easy-to-use interface compared to competitors, database operations do not need a specialist, and simple to manage for our security team. Additionally, the solution can show all the databases and the level of sensitivity. It can show what is more sensitive or less sensitive."
"It has a lot of different components that cover the needs of our customers."
"The performance of the solution is good."
"The most valuable features of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security are vulnerability assessment, enrichment security policy, and security"
"We use it for database security, vulnerability analysis, discovery, and handling requests from applications and users."
"It has a very user-friendly interface that's very detailed."
"Currently, we have audit features for auditing databases, for example, granular auditing, which we really enjoy. We've been using it to check what users do."
"Flexible reporting allows for customization that keeps the admins from having to interact with system automation."
"It allows us to run models against it and do reports against it without understanding the different database technologies."
"The centralization of the data is probably the most useful feature because we span multiple database technologies. We also find the GBDI portion of it very helpful."
"It is very expensive. Its price can be better."
"Its reporting can be improved. The reporting feature is currently not good enough for our clients."
"The solution is expensive."
"Some cloud versions are not supported by the agent."
"I have worked with IBM before, and I prefer its ease of deployment and management. Imperva SecureSphere Database Security has tricky deployment, whereas IBM's deployment is straightforward because of the UI."
"Integration with other databases or third-party products would be useful."
"SecureSphere activity log can be used with Imperva CounterBreach in an effort to protect enterprise data from theft and loss caused."
"The GUI is bad."
"It can be simplified as it is a little complicated."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly. Right now, it's a little bit of a complicated product to use. Another problem that we have is with encrypted traffic on Oracle. This is because it requires a database outage. That's a pain in the butt because you're monitoring critical systems, and they don't like outages."
More Imperva SecureSphere Database Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is ranked 2nd in Database Security with 52 reviews while jSonar is ranked 8th in Database Security with 2 reviews. Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is rated 8.2, while jSonar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security writes "The fine-grained auditing available on the platform makes life easier and helps explain anything happening in your database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of jSonar writes "Serves as a data lake for database activity and helps to centralize and normalize data". Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, Oracle Audit Vault, DataSunrise Database Security, Trustwave DbProtect and Imperva DDoS, whereas jSonar is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Oracle Audit Vault. See our Imperva SecureSphere Database Security vs. jSonar report.
See our list of best Database Security vendors.
We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
