We performed a comparison between Imperva Web Application Firewall and Radware Cloud WAF Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Compared to other web application firewalls in the market, Imperva does things in the most accurate way."
"The solution can scale."
"The compliance is the most valuable aspect."
"The configurability of the tools and the ease of operation to be the most valuable feature of Imperva."
"Its inline transferring mode is the most valuable because it is 100% transparent. When you change the IP, there is no change on the network side. If you can't and want to try to reach an IP, you can reach the server IP. There are many other advanced security features in it. The smallest appliances of Imperva can handle the highest traffic at a customer site. For example, a smaller appliance from Imperva can provide you the same security as an F5 product."
"It mitigates all of the availabilities of risks around web applications."
"The features I have found most valuable with Imperva Web Application Firewall are account takeover protection, advanced bot protection, and API security."
"I am impressed with the product's scalability, availability, easy management, and security. We were able to integrate the product with Azure and Sentinel."
"The most valuable feature of Radware Cloud WAF Service is the visibility into attacks that are being cut off instantly."
"DDoS protection is a valuable feature that works efficiently."
"The solution requires very little maintenance; we install it, it works without any problems, is reliable, and we can almost forget about it."
"The API Discovery is also very good because the application is outsourced, which means that we don't have the code. API Discovery allowed me to discover precisely how to orchestrate the API so that I could see the results."
"Cloud WAF's interface is easy to use and protects us from OWASP Top Ten threats. Our dev team do QA checks on applications before they go live, but Cloud WAF creates an additional security layer on our website."
"I particularly appreciate the low administrative burden of this solution, as well as the excellent monitoring tools."
"With the current visibility dashboard, we can now obtain insight into the nature of attacks, identify attackers, and detect top IP or threat regions."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring dashboard that we access through the portal."
"It should be more user-friendly. Like other web solutions, it would be helpful to be able to easily do policy configuration and identification inside the application. Understanding the in-depth configuration of a policy is somewhat difficult for an engineer, and they can improve that."
"They recently separated the WAF and the DAM management gateways in order for each of these to be managed from different areas, so I believe it now requires additional investments for what was previously a single complete solution."
"The Imperva Web Application Firewall automations are good, but there is still room for improvement with them."
"It would be helpful to have a "recommended deployment", or even a list of basic features that should either be used or turned on by default."
"An improvement for Imperva WAF would be to reduce the number of false positives and create more strong use cases based on AI/ML or behavioral analytics."
"The UI interface needs improvement."
"One potential improvement for Imperva is enhancing its alert system."
"The support for the on-premises version needs improvement."
"The lower-level technical team at Radware could improve their approach to problem-solving as they sometimes are very slow."
"The connection between the front and back ends could be improved."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service should provide SSL certificates for its hosting customers."
"The integration part could be better."
"The Cloud Portal has room for improvement."
"The implementation was hit or miss for the first few months. They did some tweaking and, since then, there have been no problems."
"They have a portal for webinar training but because we are in a Spanish-speaking country, it is difficult for us to watch them. Not all of us are fluent in English, but most of the courses and webinars are in English. That part could be improved..."
"It would be ideal if Radware could offer a bundled package that includes Cloud WAF, web DDoS protection, bot manager, and Alteon for a more comprehensive security solution."
More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Imperva Web Application Firewall is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 47 reviews while Radware Cloud WAF Service is ranked 11th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 17 reviews. Imperva Web Application Firewall is rated 8.6, while Radware Cloud WAF Service is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Imperva Web Application Firewall writes "Offers simulation for studying infrastructure and hybrid infrastructure protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Cloud WAF Service writes "Serves as a comprehensive solution for both our current and prospective customers, generating revenue for us". Imperva Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door, whereas Radware Cloud WAF Service is most compared with AWS WAF, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Imperva DDoS. See our Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.