We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Integration Hub and Informatica PowerCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Performance and flexibility-wise, they're very user-friendly."
"The technical support services are good."
"The MDM solution is capable of integrating multiple systems, so it helped us to solve the purpose of centralizing the depository as well as the standardization of mass data. It takes away all the ambiguity around data integrity issues or all the process challenges which happen when every stage of a process uses a different source as master data."
"Informatica PowerCenter has been implementing mapping design, data flow, and workflow execution for years."
"The most valuable features of Informatica PowerCenter are the ease of use, and development, and is simple to find resources."
"The ability to scale through partitions helped us to improve the performance."
"I like the completeness of the way I can build ETL workflows."
"I like the automated scheduling feature."
"Technical support is great. It's one of the reasons we really like them. When you compare support from IBM and support from Informatica, Informatica is much better."
"We have found the PowerCenter and B2B data transformation most valuable."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring tools and the reporting manager."
"When it comes to UI look and feel and user experience, Informatica is not as good as other solutions."
"They could provide more robust performance for data integration processes. It would help in improving the data quality more efficiently."
"The initial setup was not very straightforward. Not complex, but not very simple either."
"Its licensing can be improved. It should be features-wise and not bundle-wise. A bundle will definitely be costly. In addition, we might use one or two features. That's why the pricing model should be based on the features. The model should be flexible enough based on the features. Their support should also be more responsive to premium customers."
"There is a need to buy a separate license if one wishes to connect with some kind of SAP system, such as SalesForce."
"The documentation could be improved."
"I would like to see improvements made to the custom transformations. It should be more open for users that want to write their own code and use cases."
"The pricing could be improved."
"Unstructured data handling is an important area with a shortcoming that needs improvement in the solution."
"This product is going to decommission in the next couple of years."
"They should release new versions for the solution's on-premises setup."
More Informatica Data Integration Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Data Integration Hub is ranked 37th in Data Integration with 3 reviews while Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 3rd in Data Integration with 78 reviews. Informatica Data Integration Hub is rated 8.0, while Informatica PowerCenter is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Integration Hub writes "Excellent at standardizing mass data and capable of integrating with multiple solutions ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "Stable, provides good support, and integrating it with other systems is very fast, but its pricing is expensive". Informatica Data Integration Hub is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Azure Data Factory, SAP Data Hub, Mule Anypoint Platform and SAS Data Management, whereas Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Azure Data Factory, SSIS, Databricks and AWS Glue. See our Informatica Data Integration Hub vs. Informatica PowerCenter report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.