We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"I find the solution's dashboard interesting...The response time is fine. You can pull up reports without dragging or consuming bandwidth."
"The integrations for this solution are very good. I use a different product for virtual patching of vulnerabilities and Qualys integrates well with that product."
"The reporting functionality is great."
"There are many features. Its reliability, ease of installation, ease of use, and the richness of the information provided are the most valuable features."
"Qualys VM had a recent upgrade and the newer version is supporting the cloud."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability scanning, policy compliance scanning, and tablet for web application scanning."
"Qualys VM's best feature is vulnerability management."
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
"The tool needs to improve the adding assets and report generation features. I would like to see the policy scan of offline appliances in the product's future releases."
"I would like to see this solution more developed and competitive in the Cloud space."
"Qualys VM could improve by having more skilled support personnel."
"They have integrated with other third parties, but it is still not viable."
"What we have found is that the solution is not closely tied with the patch management. It is okay with newer ones, like Windows 10 machines; it gives the correct patch. But for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, it does not give us the correct patch so we have to manually identify the patches. This is a major problem."
"We face issues while scanning multiple assets."
"Improve the user interface."
"Qualys VM's vulnerability scan could be improved, especially the number of CVE numbers it can manage at a time."
Earn 20 points
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 45th in Vulnerability Management while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Brinqa, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.