We performed a comparison between Ivanti Secure Access and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."
"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."
"It also provides an auto-connect feature. When you turn on your laptop and put it on auto-connect, it automatically connects."
"It works perfectly for me. It is very user-friendly in terms of the configuration and the setup process."
"The side-to-side connections are valuable."
"All of our offices are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The solution is scalable."
"It is scalable and depends on your chosen network bandwidth."
"The Azure tool is useful and powerful and availability for clients. The updates are very good and reliable."
"The most valuable feature is the networking. I didn't have a good experience with the networking that Sophos has."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is its performance. It is very fast."
"The point-to-site is pretty good for the B2C stuff. It's fairly straightforward to set up."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ."
"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."
"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."
"It isn't stabilized on the first day, and you need to set up the channels properly."
"Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway could improve by providing IPS zero-day threat protection. For example, the IPS zero-day threat protection can monitor the user behavior to protect the infrastructure. The solution can only be used as a VPN, it is lacking features."
"Considering my past interactions with Microsoft's support team, it is difficult to get the right support unless you find the right person to speak with from the customer support team."
"More configuration options could be included in Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway."
"In the next release, Microsoft should add an option to schedule upgrades."
"They should release a less expensive version of the solution."
"The connectivity should be faster."
"Documentation and configuration settings can be improved."
Ivanti Secure Access is ranked 27th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 3 reviews while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is ranked 4th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 19 reviews. Ivanti Secure Access is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Secure Access writes "Integrates well, highly reliable, but lacking reporting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway writes "A scalable and reliable solution that enables users to connect to older protocols that other products do not have". Ivanti Secure Access is most compared with Ivanti Connect Secure, Tailscale, NetMotion Mobility and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, whereas Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Ivanti Connect Secure. See our Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.