We compared Jira and Polarion ALM based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Jira stands out for its flexibility, customization, and robust workflow management system, with positive feedback on its collaboration features and customer support. Conversely, Polarion ALM is praised for its comprehensive project management capabilities and seamless integration with other tools. Feedback suggests that Jira could improve its user interface and customization options, while Polarion ALM users seek enhancements in the user interface, integration, performance, and stability. Both products offer positive returns on investment, with users highlighting value for money and favorable outcomes.
Features: Jira offers exceptional flexibility, seamless integration with other tools, robust workflow management, customization options, and comprehensive reporting. Polarion ALM stands out for its comprehensive project management capabilities, effective tracking and management, flexibility, customization options, seamless integration, and intuitive user interface.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost of Jira is not explicitly mentioned in the summary, while for Polarion ALM, users mention that the cost of the software can be high but offers value for money. Some users also mention that the setup process for Polarion ALM is straightforward and easy to handle., While Jira has been praised for its efficiency, collaboration, and customizable features, user feedback suggests that Polarion ALM also offers positive outcomes and benefits for businesses.
Room for Improvement: Jira users have pointed out that its user interface is overwhelming and complex, lacking customization options and integration with other tools. Users also suggest better reporting and analytics features. On the other hand, Polarion ALM could improve its intuitive interface, integration with other tools, performance and stability, and provide more customization options based on user feedback.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews indicate that both Jira and Polarion ALM have varying durations for establishing a new tech solution. While some users spend three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, others reported one week for both deployment and setup. This suggests differences in how these terms are understood between the two products., The customer service experience in Jira is highly regarded and valued, with prompt and knowledgeable responses. Polarion ALM also provides highly satisfactory customer service, with timely and effective assistance from a knowledgeable and responsive team.
The summary above is based on 53 interviews we conducted recently with Jira and Polarion ALM users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"It is very straightforward and easy to use."
"We integrate Jira with QRadar which is helpful."
"The burndown chart is also helpful when it comes to reporting and allows us to know where we are going, especially during development."
"The most valuable features are that it is good for tracking the issues and it provides for the usage of Confluence."
"The integration is nice. We can integrate with TeamViewer and many more solutions. We need to go into Jira to complete the secure software delivery."
"The solution offers up great transparency that makes it possible for everyone inside the departmental organization to see what's happening."
"It's very flexible. I can define workflows and custom fields and dependencies between issues and projects. And every project can have a custom configuration with my fields, my names for fields, my validations, and my workflows. It's very customizable."
"One of the valuable features is traceability from requirements to test cases."
"Polarion ALM has some valuable tools for managing our targets and requirements. I think that's its best feature."
"Scalability is good...The integration is quite good."
"It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins."
"The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it."
"The solution offers good integration."
"The features I find the most valuable are requirement tracking and schematics."
"It is a very stable solution."
"It offers good performance."
"Although it covers the overall requirements and measurements, it'll help if they had their own test execution feature."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"I would prefer it if the solution was more intuitive."
"There should be a way to look for specific comments. When we have thousands of comments on a Jira ticket, there is no way to look at the comments of a specific type. In the comments, if there is a way to put a tag, it would be helpful. For example, when there are a lot of lengthy discussions happening on a particular ticket, there could be a conclusion tag or something like that to indicate a conclusion. It would help in sorting the comments based on a certain category, such as conclusion."
"The part when it comes to the testing area is a bit hard to handle. The screen is too small, you can't really read what you're typing in, and it's only for the testing area. It looks like they have pressed in more than the UI system could handle to display it properly."
"It would be very practical if you can more freely reach the information that is already inside the system. Currently, we have to buy add-ons for it. There is a lot of information in the Jira system that you can handle only through add-ons. You cannot reach such information on your own. If you want to use this information, which is already in the system, you have to buy some add-on to use. For example, information about how much time an assignee is spending on a ticket is there in the system, but you cannot access it without an add-on. JQL is a very good way to reach the data inside Jira. If we can reach more objects, even through JQL, it would be great."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I'm mostly focusing on the requirements traceability with my thesis, the integration could improve for other tools. The companies are not only using Jira. For example, for the test cases or for the documents templates, we are using Polarion and we have been having some integration issues."
"As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming."
"The tool needs to improve its planning. It also needs to add more integrations."
"The weak point of Polarion ALM software is about reporting and time for extraction of the data...The quality of reporting needs to improve."
"The ease-of-use could be improved a little."
"We use PTC Windchill, and Polarion ALM doesn't have native integration, so we had to purchase the connector to integrate it with Polarion ALM. We still haven't implemented it."
"One of Polarion's shortcomings would be planning. It can handle plans, but the planning feature is very basic."
"The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on."
"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and a server-based application rather than client based."
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews while Polarion ALM is ranked 8th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 17 reviews. Jira is rated 8.2, while Polarion ALM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion ALM writes "Though needing an improvement in reporting and time for extraction of the data, its integration capabilities are good". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and TFS, whereas Polarion ALM is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Codebeamer, PTC Integrity, GitLab and Jama Connect. See our Jira vs. Polarion ALM report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
