We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Vinyl and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's made things seamless and it's more efficient, and there's an audit trail where it wasn't there before."
"VINYL works across different data sources. It is very useful to be able to map the data across different data sources and different environments. It is also very easy to develop small applications within a short span of time."
"The way that they've done some of the reports, they've created really great data dumps. If I want to see a snapshot of something in time, for a given timeframe, I can download it. From that download, I can create further analysis or do my own thing with it, which is really helpful. I'm even able to go back several years and get data."
"The product has reduced the time that it takes us to produce apps."
"This is an extremely scalable solution because it enables us to interface with all types of disparate information."
"The feature that I find most valuable with Zudy VINYL is how flexible it is. There are so many ways that you can connect data to it and there are so many features that are out-of-the-box that make the product very flexible and easy and easy to work with. It's got a great user interface which makes it a nice looking product that our employees are able to engage with quickly."
"You do not need to be a programmer to use it or build something in it."
"App development, database storage, and 3rd party app integrations are great."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Once or twice, when a new version of VINYL comes out, it has had a negative impact on a feature. However, we do everything in a test environment. Unless we miss something in test, we don't go live with it if it isn't perfect. Zudy hasn't had too many stumbles along the way, but there have been a couple times, and it's been minor."
"Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard."
"While some of the reporting functionality is adequate, reporting needs to continue to be worked on, given the fact that there are a lot of really good reporting tools out there."
"It might help if they put out different types that would provide different ways to view the data. I'd like to see more on that."
"The ease of use for individuals to self-serve could be improved. The solution is no-code, but there is still a decent learning curve associated with the product and some app design principles necessary before people can self-serve."
"Version 2.3 has a good UI but we want a more customizable UI."
"I sometimes find formatting tricky to get the front end of an app the way I want it."
"The features that I'd like to see in VINYL next would be the ability to have more control over, or have a rule-based control over column headings and column labels."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
Jitterbit Vinyl is ranked 20th in Rapid Application Development Software with 31 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 38th in Rapid Application Development Software. Jitterbit Vinyl is rated 8.8, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Vinyl writes "Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Jitterbit Vinyl is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, QuickBase and OutSystems, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
