We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and Tricentis Tosca based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Tricentis Tosca comes out on top in this comparison. The solution is easy to use and manage and offers some very robust intuitive features. The low-code option makes it easy for any user to maneuver across the solution and achieve effective outcomes. Tricentis Tosca is continually improving the solution, which enables organizations to complete tasks more efficiently and with greater speed and precision.
"Whenever I speak to the support team of Katalon Studio, I learn that some new features will be included in the product. It is a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is the ease of use of the solution."
"Smart Wait and XPath healing are valuable features."
"This solution is very user-friendly to learn and implement, and less technical knowledge is required to handle automation."
"It is a good tool and provides all the essential features for our business requirements."
"I like the feature where you can define a model that represents your website and then reuse the components from the model. It makes creating more test cases easy."
"One of the features that I like is Object Recognition. It worked very well, and it allowed me to create a dynamic expert based on my requirements."
"I personally like the 'Object Spy' feature of this tool. It makes it easy to find an element on the web page."
"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."
"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people."
"For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing."
"Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."
"We have had some issues when it comes to stability, which is something that needs to be improved."
"The solution can be further improved with better loading time."
"Katalon lacks integration with other software, including integrating other languages like .NET and PHP."
"Katalon Studio could improve having visual testing, but I think they're launching that feature very soon. We would like to see an increase in the usage of AI."
"There could potentially be more reporting within the solution. We need more issue reports, for example."
"The integration process with Jira should be enhanced and facilitated."
"Object Spy is brittle. When I try to capture objects, I have to proceed multiple times before it works."
"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language."
"Primarily I'm dealing with customers looking for a cheap solution, and they are willing to try open-source automation solutions. So from this perspective, the price of Tosca is not as competitive."
"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."
"They need to improve on the reports after the execution of automation tests, since all the current organizations are looking for detailed graphical reports."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"I would like a better user interface."
"The source controls that are in Tricentis Tosca have some problems. For example, if you use Selenium or use Java-based application, it's easy to match code from two developers. However, if you're a developer and going to look at Tricentis Tosca, it's very difficult to use the source control measure."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 41 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Regression Testing Tools with 98 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". Katalon Studio is most compared with Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim, Appium and Ranorex Studio, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman, Testim and SmartBear TestComplete. See our Katalon Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors, best API Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.