Kubescape vs Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Container Security
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (7th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Compliance Management (4th)
Kubescape
Ranking in Container Security
33rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Se...
Ranking in Container Security
18th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Nilesh Jadhav - PeerSpot reviewer
May 6, 2024
Improves security posture, reduces false positives, and speeds up remediation time
Our infrastructure is on AWS and we integrate PingSafe with our enterprise accounts to identify misconfiguration on the Cloud The offensive security engine helps us visualize any potential attacks. PingSafe helps us maintain and improve our security posture. It has helped reduce the number of…
Use Kubescape?
Share your opinion
II
Jun 7, 2023
A straightforward solution for vulnerability scanning and monitoring containers
I'm not sure that I can accurately answer what needs improvement because my part of working was integrating. So, I believe the first week, I've never had a lot of problems with Red Hat as much as with the code or writing the programming. The APIs have more access to the data than the web UI. Like, I believe I can do more automatic things with APIs than the WebUI. Also, I can have filtering with more accuracy in APIs than the web UI. So, the aforementioned areas can be considered for improvement. I felt like working with Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security's API, that it's more flexible than working directly with the web UI. The documentation about Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security available online is very limited. But now I remember that it's very limited because it was integrated, and they had bought it from another company. I forgot the name of the other solution. The documentation is an area to focus on because, for a new program, the same developers of the old solution start working at Red Hat Enterprise. So it's very limited to the documentation. It was because it has a straightforward user interface. So, they didn't add or put up some documentation about it except for installation, implementation, and configuration, of course. But, dealing so much with it was hard for me, considering my attempts to find documentation because it was a new product.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For pricing, it currently seems to be in line with market rates."
"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's pricing is good."
"I am not involved in the pricing, but it is cost-effective."
"The pricing is fair. It is not inexpensive, and it is also not expensive. When managing a large organization, it is going to be costly, but it meets the business needs. In terms of what is out there on the market, it is fair and comparable to what I have seen, so I do not have any complaints about the cost"
"Its pricing is constant. It has been constant over the previous year, so I am happy with it. However, price distribution can be better explained. That is the only area I am worried about. Otherwise, the pricing is very reasonable."
"The pricing for PingSafe in India was more reasonable than other competitors."
"PingSafe is not very expensive compared to Prisma Cloud, but it's also not that cheap. However, because of its features, it makes sense to us as a company. It's fairly priced."
"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's licensing and price were cheaper than the other solutions we looked at."
Information not available
"The pricing model is moderate, meaning it is not very expensive."
"Red Hat offers two pricing options for their solution: a separate price, and a bundled price under the OpenShift Platform Plus."
"We purchase a yearly basis license for the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
When I joined my organization, I saw that PingSafe was already implemented. I started to use the tool's alerting feat...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?
I like virtualization and all those tools that come with OpenShift. I also like Advanced Cluster Management and the b...
What needs improvement with Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?
The solution's visibility and vulnerability prevention should be improved.
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?
Red Hat can be utilized for anything, including OpenShift, Kubernetes, dev environments, automation, banking, and man...
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
No data available
StackRox
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
City National Bank, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security. Updated: June 2024.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.