We performed a comparison between Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is highly regarded for its extensive visibility and management features, including Cloud Security Posture Management and container security. On the other hand, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes receives acclaim for its excellent resource-sharing and segmentation capabilities. Prisma Cloud could be more customizable and integrate with ticketing solutions better. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes requires enhancements in testing, documentation, usability, and stability.
Service and Support: Some Prisma Cloud customers have called Palo Alto support exceptional and prompt, while others have reported sluggish response times. Customers have generally provided positive remarks about the customer service offered by Red Hat, deeming it to be of high quality.
Ease of Deployment: Some Prisma Cloud users found the setup process to be simple, but others said it was somewhat complicated. The deployment time varies depending on the customer environment. The setup for Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes involves creating multiple customer resource files and deploying the desired image as a container. The setup is considered moderately easy and the deployment time varies based on the customer's needs, with financial institutions typically taking longer.
Pricing: Users have differing opinions on the setup cost of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but many find it to be reasonable and competitive. On the other hand, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is moderately priced and offers subscription-based options along with a bundled price.
ROI: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has proven to be highly effective at preventing breaches, enhancing risk visibility, streamlining operations, and mitigating cyberattack threats. Users have provided limited feedback regarding the ROI of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes.
Comparison Results: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is preferred over Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes. Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive visibility and management options through a user-friendly web GUI. Users appreciate its anomaly detection abilities, seamless integration with other tools, and the ability to provide security across multi- and hybrid-cloud environments. Compared to Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes falls short in terms of usability, documentation, and stability.
"I like CSPM the most. It captures a lot of alerts within a short period of time. When an alert gets triggered on the cloud, it throws an alert within half an hour, which is very reasonable. It is a plus point for us."
"There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"Cloud Native Security's most valuable features include cloud misconfiguration detection and remediation, compliance monitoring, a robust authentication security engine, and cloud threat detection and response capabilities."
"The visibility is the best part of the solution."
"We've seen a reduction in resources devoted to vulnerability monitoring. Before PingSafe we spent a lot of time monitoring and fixing these issues. PingSafe enabled us to divert more resources to the production environment."
"It scans our containers in real time. Also, as they're built, it's looking into the container repository where the images are built, telling us ahead of time, "You have vulnerabilities here, and you should update this code before you deploy." And once it's deployed, it's scanning for vulnerabilities that are in production as the container is running."
"The first aspect that is important is the fact that Prisma Cloud is cloud-agnostic. It's actually available for the five top cloud providers: AWS, GCP, Azure, Oracle, and Alibaba Cloud. The second aspect is the fact that we can write our own rules to try to detect misconfigurations in those environments."
"The CVEs are valuable because we used to have a tool to scan CVEs, at the language level, for the dependencies that our developers had. What is good about Prisma Cloud is that the CVEs are not only from the software layer, but from all layers: the language, the base image, and you also have CVEs from the host. It covers the full base of security."
"We are provided with a single tool to protect all of our cloud resources and applications without having to manage and reconcile compliance reports."
"The application visibility is amazing. For example, sometimes we don't know what a particular custom port is for and what is running on it. The visibility enables us to identify applications, what the protocol is, and what service is behind it. Within Azure, it is doing a great job of providing visibility. We know exactly what is passing through our network. If there is an issue of any sort we are able to quickly detect it and fix the problem."
"Integration is very easy. And because it supports security that spans multi- and hybrid-cloud environments, it's very easy to use."
"The most valuable features of Prisma Cloud are its cloud security posture management and cloud workload protection capabilities."
"The initial setup is seamless."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share resources."
"The benefit of working with the solution is the fact that it's very straightforward...It is a perfectly stable product since the details are very accurate."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"One of the most valuable features I found was the ability of this solution to map the network and show you the communication between your containers and your different nodes."
"The technical support is good."
"Segmentation is the most powerful feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring feature."
"It is easy to install and manage."
More Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Pros →
"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."
"It would be really helpful if the solution improves its agent deployment process."
"Whenever I view the processes and the process aspect, it takes a long time to load."
"They can work on policies based on different compliance standards."
"We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization."
"With Cloud Native Security, we can't selectively enable or disable alerts based on our specific use case."
"There is a bit of a learning curve for new users."
"In some cases, the rules are strictly enforced but do not align with real-world use cases."
"Though Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides excellent security, is a pioneer in this space, and knows what it's doing, from a user perspective, it would have been better if it was a little easier to use."
"This solution is more AWS and Azure-centric. It needs to be more specific on the GCP side, which they are working on."
"The automation must continue to become much smoother."
"The area for improvement is less about the product and more about the upsell. If we've already agreed that we'd like your product x, y, or z, don't try to add fries to my burger. I don't need it."
"The alignment of Twistlock Defender agents with image repositories needs improvement. These deployed agents have no way of differentiating between on-premise and cloud-based image repositories. If I deploy a Defender agent to secure an on-premise Kubernetes cluster, that agent also tries to scan my ECR image repositories on AWS. So, we have limited options for aligning those Defenders with the repositories that we want them to scan. It is scanning everything rather than giving us the ability to be real granular in choosing which agents can scan which repositories."
"We face some GUI issues related to new permissions for AWS. So far, we don't have any automation to complete them through the GUI. We have to manually update the permissions. Our customers have faced some issues with that."
"The regional cost of Prisma Cloud in South Africa is high and could be improved."
"We'd like to have more native integration with clouds and additional security checks in the future."
"The deprecation of APIs is a concern since the deprecation of APIs will cause issues for us every time we upgrade."
"Red Hat is somewhat expensive."
"The solution's price could be better."
"The documentation about Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security available online is very limited... So it's very limited to the documentation."
"They're trying to convert it to the platform as a source. They are moving in the direction of Cloud Foundry so it can be easier for a developer to deploy it."
"The solution lacks features when compared to some of the competitors such as Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and has room for improvement."
"The initial setup is pretty complex. There's a learning curve, and its cost varies across different environments. It's difficult."
"The solution's visibility and vulnerability prevention should be improved."
More Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Cons →
More Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 82 reviews while Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is ranked 16th in Container Security with 10 reviews. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes writes "Provides network mapping feature for visualizing container communication but complex setup ". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub and Orca Security, whereas Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is most compared with Aqua Cloud Security Platform, SUSE NeuVector, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure and Qualys VMDR. See our Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
