Layer7 API Management vs SwaggerHub comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
6,609 views|4,807 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
SmartBear Logo
3,586 views|2,704 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Layer7 API Management and SwaggerHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Layer7 API Management vs. SwaggerHub Report (Updated: March 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is that it enables me to present data in the format that the client wants to consume it. That client might be a visualization tool, that client might be a report, that client might be a customer's API requirements.""Has great drag-and-drop features and requires minimal coding.""The Gateway is most important because it is our strategic front door into the company for all APIs.""We can get more visibility into our data.""One of the features that the tool provides is the ability to simply onboard new APIs to an existing security platform. We build all the policies for security upfront, and then we can add those policies pretty simply and straightforwardly to any new API that gets developed in the enterprise.""The initial setup process is easy and flexible.""The most valuable feature was the gateway because it has a good dashboard which shows all the hits, misses, and issues, how often you are viewing, what was the response time, etc. The gateway was very easy to deploy.""The solution has numerous configuration options to increase security in communication."

More Layer7 API Management Pros →

"It is quite a useful tool. It is quite good with the validation of the spec. It works quite well in terms of errors and conformity to the OpenAPI standard. It is better than Visual Studio Code in terms of editing.""You can click & play and add the notation in a human-readable form. Spotlight is also very good in the graphical design of APIs.""The scalability is endless.""The most valuable features are the collaboration between multiple teams and the control and distribution of specifications.""The product's initial setup phase was easy and not at all difficult.""The tool's most valuable feature is licensing.""Code generation is one of the important features of SwaggerHub. We design our API, and we can generate a very rich codebase and add to it. The code generation feature is very valuable.""It is a stable solution."

More SwaggerHub Pros →

Cons
"From the last version, they have added more dashboard support, but there is still a lot they need to improve. In terms of monitoring, it's almost all covered. The interface can be improved, though.""Layer7 API Management should give a clear roadmap of the product and where it is going, and they should not change the underlying layers.""It needs better mobile features and HA configuration.""The product's initial setup phase is not very straightforward, making it an area where improvements are required.""CA double up portal is a pain. It is something that we are struggling with right now.""Some problems with response time.""I understand that clients are often concerned about costs. They might be exploring other options due to the high cost associated with our current package.""One day, where we can have a microservices gateway and we will not need the classic gateway at all, that is what we want to see."

More Layer7 API Management Cons →

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need.""SwaggerHub lacks in terms of integrations. They have APIs integrated, and they also have some connectors, but they don't have integration with many of the things that we use. For example, for connecting with SVN, we had to implement external scripts. So, they should work on the integration because currently, we have to work on the integration with our DevOps, continuous delivery, or continuous deployment. It would be great if these integrations are built-in. Mainly, we would like it to integrate with SVN and Jira.""SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools.""The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that.""We have to use additional tools to test APIs.""More integration and usability with the cloud microservices would be nice""SwaggerHub's UI needs to be improved as it looks very old school.""It could be more intuitive compared to one of its competitors."

More SwaggerHub Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "CA has great pricing for gateways, so negotiate with your sales team."
  • "If the CA pricing for API management would be a little lower, they would be able to cover a broader market."
  • "Purchase 4.0 now and wait until they flush out the 4.1 problems."
  • "It depends on your use case of course, how much you want to go with that, because it can get pricey and depends on the size of your company."
  • "Be aware of additional licenses for your warm standby. Ensure you get plenty of non-production licenses."
  • "Do not buy piecemeal."
  • "It's my manager who takes care of the pricing. But I keep on hearing that it's a little pricey, it's on the higher side. That is what he says."
  • "Pricing is competitive. CA is ready to offer attractive discounts."
  • More Layer7 API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."
  • "The management considers it a bit expensive. At first, we wanted to purchase a license for 100 users, but we went for a license for only 15 users. Its cost is $10,220 per year."
  • "The tool is cheap."
  • More SwaggerHub Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's technical support is good.
    Top Answer:Licenses are required to operate the product, but I don't know much about the validity periods attached to it.
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is not very straightforward, making it an area where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is licensing.
    Top Answer:I noticed that the editor on SwaggerHub, like Gabbiti, is graphical in nature. With this mind map interface, one can easily define endpoints and paths. The solution is lacking behind because it not… more »
    Top Answer:When you want to define an API with your customers using SwaggerHub, you first interact with them to understand their requirements. Then, you proceed to build the API definition. This involves… more »
    Ranking
    10th
    out of 67 in API Management
    Views
    6,609
    Comparisons
    4,807
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    503
    Rating
    7.8
    15th
    out of 67 in API Management
    Views
    3,586
    Comparisons
    2,704
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway
    Learn More
    Overview

    Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs. 

    It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic. 

    With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.

    SwaggerHub is an integrated API Development platform, built for teams, that brings the core capabilities of the Swagger framework to design, build, document and deploy APIs. SwaggerHub enables development teams to collaborate and coordinate the entire lifecycle of an API with the flexibility to integrate with the toolset of your choice.

    Sample Customers
    1. IBM  2. Microsoft  3. Oracle  4. Salesforce  5. SAP  6. Cisco  7. Dell  8. HP  9. Adobe  10. VMware  11. Accenture  12. Capgemini  13. Deloitte  14. PwC  15. Ernst & Young  16. Infosys  17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)  18. Wipro  19. Cognizant  20. HCL Technologies  21. Tech Mahindra  22. Fujitsu  23. Hitachi  24. NEC  25. NTT Data  26. Ericsson  27. Nokia  28. Siemens  29. AT&T  30. Verizon  31. Vodafone  32. Orange
    Sonic, Zuora, Woolworths, CrowdFlower
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Insurance Company10%
    Retailer8%
    Computer Software Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Layer7 API Management vs. SwaggerHub
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Layer7 API Management vs. SwaggerHub and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Layer7 API Management is ranked 10th in API Management with 110 reviews while SwaggerHub is ranked 15th in API Management with 10 reviews. Layer7 API Management is rated 8.4, while SwaggerHub is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Layer7 API Management writes "Has great drag-and-drop features and it requires minimal coding ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SwaggerHub writes "Simplifies API design and development for developers". Layer7 API Management is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Amazon API Gateway and Microsoft Azure API Management, whereas SwaggerHub is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Amazon API Gateway and RapidAPI. See our Layer7 API Management vs. SwaggerHub report.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.