We performed a comparison between Luxul Switches and Meraki MS Switches based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Ethernet Switches solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Remote access to the router is a huge time saver."
"The ePoE+ is great."
"The solution is less expensive than other options."
"Being able to look at every port and see what it is connected to is very useful. Everything seems to be running really well. They've got everything covered. They have a really cool mounting system at the bottom and an access point that you can use to level up your device. It is kind of cool."
"Its cloud feature and cloud management are great. They are the most valuable aspects."
"The most valuable feature of Meraki MS Switches is user-friendliness."
"The most valuable feature about Meraki is the console. The second most valuable feature, to me, is the technical support and the infrastructure behind the console."
"The solution has been very stable so far."
"The most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches are their reliability and simplicity."
"The main features of Meraki MS Switches are integration, high quality, and hardware guarantee."
"The most valuable features of Meraki MS Switches are ease of use, and we can find technical knowledge easily."
"Documentation and access to it could be greatly improved."
"You do need to be an IT person in order to handle the initial setup. An AV person would struggle a bit."
"The documentation could be improved; it's quite basic."
"We had some dashboard licensing issues, maybe because their method of collecting data from the user needs to be more streamlined."
"On the switches, I don't know a whole lot that I would change. Different levels of switches have different layer 2 and layer 3 functionality. It's always nice to have layer 3 functionality across the board if you can, but that drives up the cost. They've got different lines for different amounts of layer 3 functionality. However, on their models that do include full layer 3 access, when you choose to use layer 3 on a switch, it doesn't have the full functioning routing capabilities of an MX firewall. It can be limiting in some of those aspects."
"Technical support hold times seem to be getting longer."
"The documentation could be more extensive. For example, it could describe more scenarios. It would be great if they could incorporate AI engines into the switching infrastructure and firewall so you can configure it to prevent intrusion. They have intrusion prevention and detection, but they could enhance it by incorporating AI into their firewall."
"In terms of troubleshooting, if we get more tools there is an issue."
"The lead times can be long in terms of actually getting the hardware."
"I don't like some of the mobile device management options. They're a little bit hard to find in the system."
"Meraki should include an application to assist users with the design of access points."
Earn 20 points
Luxul Switches is ranked 26th in Ethernet Switches while Meraki MS Switches is ranked 5th in Ethernet Switches with 87 reviews. Luxul Switches is rated 6.0, while Meraki MS Switches is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Luxul Switches writes "Greatly simplifies troubleshooting; remote access to the router is a huge time saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Meraki MS Switches writes "They're not expensive and configuration is very easy". Luxul Switches is most compared with Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, NETGEAR Switches, Cisco Ethernet Switches, QSC Q-SYS NS Series and D-Link Ethernet Switches, whereas Meraki MS Switches is most compared with Aruba Switches, Cisco Ethernet Switches, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access and NETGEAR Switches. See our Luxul Switches vs. Meraki MS Switches report.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
