We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the network-related reporting."
"Monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"Some of the most valuable features are the accessibility of the solution and the fact that it is simpler than other products. For example, discovering devices in the network is very simple, making it user-friendly."
"ManageEngine OpManager is user-friendly and easy to use. Additionally, useful for basic monitoring."
"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."
"The dashboard, versatility and larger horizon are valuable."
"I like being able to push configurations to multiple devices. If you have the same configurations for all the branches, it's easier to use ManageEngine OpManager and push configurations at once rather than individually pushing them to each device."
"We have found the solution to be stable."
"The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console."
"The solution primarily drives system information, and I believe it works fine."
"This solution helps our application teams by allowing them to drill further into issues and perform a root cause analysis."
"The product’s auto-remediation feature helps with automation."
"This is a product that does more generally than any of the competing solutions."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system."
"The solution's reporting engine has given me detailed information on which applications or services I've either failed or about to fail in terms of the predictive makeup on Azure cloud."
"SCOM's most valuable features are the network path feature, reporting, and integration with business intelligence."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely."
"The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process."
"They should add more features to URL monitoring."
"ManageEngine OpManager can improve by having better updates for critical issues."
"I would like to see more enhancements made to the product."
"This product is little bit slow sometimes. It may be that we need to change the configuration to improve performance."
"The only problem with it is that the setup isn't very intuitive. I know that they just upgraded the product to make it a little bit easier to use, but compared to some of the other platforms, it is not easy to configure it, set it up, and get it running. However, once you have set it up and got it running, it runs great."
"There should be an option to get mobile notifications or SMS mirror notifications for critical issues. That way, when we don't have access to email, we can still receive notifications via our phones."
"I would like to see more standard libraries for the market solutions, out of the box, that you don't need to do a lot of work on."
"The solution’s initial setup is difficult."
"Application monitoring must be improved."
"The initial setup should be easier to complete."
"Stability and some performance issues exist and they need improvement."
"The dashboard features are not user-friendly for our management team, only for the technical department."
"Then there is also an issue with capacity and limited space. That is something that needs to be improved."
"I would like to see better support for monitoring Unix-based systems."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews while SCOM is ranked 10th in Network Monitoring Software with 78 reviews. ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, Nagios XI and WhatsUp Gold, whereas SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and LogicMonitor. See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. SCOM report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
