We performed a comparison between Meraki Dashboard and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"I like that Meraki Dashboard is a user-friendly product."
"It's a simple, functional solution."
"The product can scale if you need it to."
"The ease-of-use and the analytics are really effective tools."
"The most valuable feature of Meraki Dashboard is we can manage our switches and access point in one place."
"We like how Meraki Dashboard lets you manage all the devices in a single pane of glass. The dashboard is intuitive and easy to use. They are constantly updating the functionality. Switches from other vendors have the same features for the life of the device, but Meraki is always improving."
"Scalability is one of Meraki Dashboard's strongest features. We have thousands of users if we're counting the end-users on our clients' network, but we have hundreds of clients."
"The most valuable feature is knowing the wireless and switch are healthy."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."
"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."
"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Price could be reduced."
"The price could be lower because the license for access points is expensive."
"Some features could be added."
"You can't really clone or replicate a device, that sort of feature would be useful. You can clone the site but you cannot clone the device."
"It would be nicer if the dashboard was lighter."
"The downside to the simplicity is that you can't get as granular as you could with the Cisco APs."
"This solution can be quite complicated to configure and manage, unless you have a technical person with specific knowledge working on it."
"What needs improvement in Meraki Dashboard is its configuration. It'll also be better if the tool has more functionality, and that is what I'd like to see in its next release."
"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."
"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."
"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."
"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."
"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."
"We haven't seen an ROI."
"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."
"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Meraki Dashboard is ranked 9th in Network Monitoring Software with 51 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. Meraki Dashboard is rated 8.6, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Meraki Dashboard writes "Incredibly easy to use, great troubleshooting and prevention of malicious events". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". Meraki Dashboard is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds NPM, ThousandEyes, Mist AI and Cloud and Zabbix, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our Meraki Dashboard vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.