We performed a comparison between Meraki SD-WAN and Nutanix Flow Network Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Juniper, Aviatrix and others in Software Defined Networking (SDN)."The most valuable feature of Meraki SD-WAN is the Auto VPN."
"Having to set up a closed system singlehandedly and a lifetime guarantee on the equipment is a valuable part of this solution."
"The Meraki SD-WAN solution is simple to deploy."
"Using Meraki just solves a lot of problems."
"The product does have a variety of features we can work with."
"The solution is pretty reliable."
"I like the entire set of features and the analytics."
"The most valuable feature is the firewall capability. It's also got a very good graphical user interface and is very easy to manage."
"Nutanix Flow is straightforward to install. You only need to select a checkmark that you want to enable Nutanix Flow."
"The network view was excellent as it allowed us to expand the server view and visualize all connections it made within the environment. This was particularly useful in identifying the path of our data and not just its location within the data center."
"Nutanix Flow Network Security is a simple solution that is usable, easy to understand, and easy to deploy."
"Flow Network Security's most valuable features are user-friendliness, the console, and policy creation."
"It allows for policies that enable complete visibility and traffic control."
"Nutanix Flow has a lot of data protection features. It's also valuable for operations and management. It's a big solution that works well with different solutions and is suitable for most business cases."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We appreciate the fact that this solution allows us to segregate two virtual machines that are in the same cluster."
"Technical support could be more knowledgeable and responsive."
"It's a matter of cost and expenses that we may take some issue with."
"The granularity could be improved."
"The VPN client could be improved."
"Meraki SD-WAN could improve by adding wireless access time-scheduled and overall capabilities."
"I would like to see more functions added to the next release of Meraki SD-WAN."
"There is still some work to do when it comes to AI."
"Some of the on-premise security features of Meraki SD-WAN are on the cloud and some of my customers do not want to use the cloud. They should have on-premise security features for those that do not want to use the cloud."
"While the graphical interface of Nutanix Flow Network Security could have been improved, and some of the reporting features needed extra work, the product's features were similar to VMware's NSX. The difference lay more in the presentation and user interface."
"The most difficult part is the configuration of the initial blueprints."
"We would like the reporting functionality of this solution to be improved."
"Nutanix Flow's networking features could use some improvement. Also, I don't know if it's currently supporting load balancing or not."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"I would rate Flow Network Security's stability seven out of ten - it could be improved."
"For customers who are running Nutanix Flow and AHV, the largest area for improvement is in the disaster recovery environments. To automate the populate of rules from one side to the other side in case of disaster you report everything on the disaster recovery site, and you have all the rules automatically applied. This was something that was being built when I left Nutanix. It might already be available. Additionally, the usability of the rules editor could improve."
"The documentation offered by the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
More Nutanix Flow Network Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Meraki SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 61 reviews while Nutanix Flow Network Security is ranked 4th in Microsegmentation Software with 8 reviews. Meraki SD-WAN is rated 8.2, while Nutanix Flow Network Security is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Meraki SD-WAN writes "Very stable security, great service, and the best for VPN management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Flow Network Security writes "Offers great integration capabilities and helps design a disaster recovery plan". Meraki SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Omada Cloud SDN, Cradlepoint NetCloud and Megaport, whereas Nutanix Flow Network Security is most compared with VMware NSX, Illumio, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Workload.
We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
