We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Java Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution because it depends on the workload you expect. Based on that data, you can configure how many users it can handle."
"The solution is completely scalable."
"The product is rather stable. We haven't had any issues with it in that sense."
"The most valuable feature is the virtual machine."
"One of the most valuable features of Microsoft Azure is the compatibility with all of our Windows applications and other Microsoft technologies"
"Feedback and error messages make much more sense in Azure than in AWS."
"The monitoring features are very good."
"The time to market is fast compared back to the traditional on-premise hosting. That is one of the better things I can say because there is no need to worry. The Pack services will enable it to start immediately."
"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."
"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."
"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."
"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."
"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."
"Cloud has provided less maintenance."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"One key feature is getting to choose the Virtual Machine configurations while setting up the server, which is an automated process."
"Its pricing should be better. In terms of features, I am yet to explore the whole solution, and the current features seem okay."
"As compared to AWS, Azure can improve its functionality. In terms of the feature list, it is still lacking a bit as compared to AWS. AWS supports lots of types of operating systems, which Azure is still catching up with. Azure is mainly focused on the Windows system, and it is not yet there in terms of integration with other operating systems like Linux, Unix. Azure is slowly catching up."
"Microsoft Azure can improve by adding more features for virtual machines, such as tier virtual machines."
"Pricing is one area where Azure has room for improvement. There should be some due consideration. Azure has solved some issues with pricing from the development team's standpoint, but it is still quite costly. They should also offer a trial period for the individual platform solutions. I think that would be pretty handy for the developers."
"I would recommend some enhancement regarding integration features."
"Price could always be better. The features come in quickly, so we're comfortable with the feature set that is available to us."
"The solution could be easier to use. However, when comparing it to AWS it is a bit easier."
"There are times when using a service in Microsoft Azure can be confusing because you have four or five options that do similar operations. It would be helpful if there was a clear decision tree around those features. Microsoft does provide a lot of decision trees around a lot of their services, but it's not for everything."
"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."
"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 299 reviews while Oracle Java Cloud Service is ranked 19th in PaaS Clouds with 15 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Java Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Java Cloud Service writes "User-friendly code development solution needing enhancements addressing glitches". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Java Cloud Service is most compared with Amazon AWS and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.