We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Permissions Management and Saviynt based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, Microsoft, CrowdStrike and others in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)."Multifactor authentication is valuable."
"The feature that we use the most is the global, third-party user management."
"It is a flexible tool because it works on JSON."
"The product is flexible to use."
"We have found the implementation process to be very easy."
"Saviynt is used for the greenfield implementation for the whole IAM, IGA, MFA, SSO, and access management."
"The repository has many features where you can define primary and secondary owners."
"The most valuable features of Saviynt are database utility and report generation. These two features have a major impact, particularly when you are trying to create a report because, in other systems, you need to use a third-party utility such as a BI tool or any other reporting tool to fetch the data and send out the report to a third party team. In Saviynt, it's a system within a system, so you don't have to use any third-party tool because you can directly do your query and write that code on Saviynt and then send that report to the team."
"The workflow in Saviynt is easier compared to other tools. It's pretty straightforward."
"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."
"The biggest drawback is that for every change you want to make, you have to go back to them and ask for it."
"The solution is hosted on AWS cloud, and there is some dependency that affects our bottom line."
"The technical support team's response time could be improved."
"UI and support could be improved. The frequent updates and version changes can be disruptive for large organizations. Not every month, a large organization can go with the changes. Saviynt needs to consider this carefully."
"The solution does not work very well as the number of users increases."
"According to feedback I've received, some users prefer SailPoint over Saviynt in real complex environments. SailPoint has its provisioning platform. Complex integrations may pose challenges in scenarios like a large bank with thousands of users, making SailPoint a preferred choice for some."
"The tool is difficult to migrate."
"The configuration process at the beginning can be difficult, depending on the complexity of the company."
More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) with 1 review while Saviynt is ranked 5th in Identity Management (IM) with 21 reviews. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is rated 7.0, while Saviynt is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management writes "Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Saviynt writes "Used for IAM, IGA, MFA, SSO, and access management". Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Microsoft Identity Manager, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Microsoft Entra ID Protection and Microsoft Intune, whereas Saviynt is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Okta Workforce Identity and ForgeRock.
We monitor all Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.