Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs Oracle Beehive comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
2,506 views|2,367 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
76 views|54 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Oracle Beehive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Content Collaboration Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
RicardoPedro
MarcAllaire
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The collaboration, the ability for multiple users to work on a single document.""This solution has provided us with a collaborative workspace to allow everyone to work together and be on the same page.""The most valuable features for us are their document management list and hybrid forms. and We also use third party ad-dons to achieve workflows and other recent apps.""It is a decent tool for collaboration, especially if you are already using other Office products.""The forms aspect of the solution, for example, the creation of surveys, is its most valuable aspect.""The support from Microsoft is very quick and they are very proactive.""The level of stability is good.""The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pros →

"This solution has automated protection from downtime. High-availability is built into every component, and the backups are completely automated.""We have really high level of services, performance, availability, and it is stable. Everything works together really well."

More Oracle Beehive Pros →

Cons
"Workflows could be simplified.""I think these tools do a pretty good job. There is only one area of improvement. Maybe Microsoft can invest a little bit more into the ease at which integration can be done with other third party applications.""The solution needs to have more flexibility. The classic version had more flexibility, however, the modern version has many more limitations.""Sharepoint doesn't integrate well with Oracle, and we use a lot of Oracle products at our company. Therefore, it makes more sense for us to go to Oracle instead of continuing to use Sharepoint.""The product could be improved by accommodating different technologies, particularly integration.""The user interface needs improvement because there is a lot of stuff in there. I use five to eight navigation buttons. It should be more user-friendly. Frequently used menu items should be arranged in a proper way. That would be helpful.""The search feature needs improvement. I can never find the information I need when I use it.""Technical support could be improved. They are not fast enough, especially when we'll go deeper in the product itself. More complex issues make it very tough to find someone that can help you."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Cons →

"The price of licenses is high and should be improved."

More Oracle Beehive Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."
  • "There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."
  • "Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."
  • "It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."
  • More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    2,506
    Comparisons
    2,367
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    76
    Comparisons
    54
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server
    Beehive
    Learn More
    Overview

    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

    Oracle Beehive provides an integrated set of communication and collaboration services built on a single scalable, secure, enterprise-class platform. Beehive allows users to access their collaborative information through familiar tools while enabling IT to consolidate infrastructure and implement a centrally managed, secure, and compliant collaboration environment built on Oracle technology.

    Sample Customers
    Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy
    Oracle
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Retailer14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Oracle Beehive is ranked 25th in Content Collaboration Platforms. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6, while Oracle Beehive is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Beehive writes "Has an excellent Database Management System and high level of services, performance, and availability". Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace, FileCloud, Kiteworks and HighQ, whereas Oracle Beehive is most compared with . See our Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive report.

    See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.