We performed a comparison between Microsoft Purview Data Governance and OneTrust DataGovernance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the tracking activity and device onboarding."
"My favorite features are eDiscovery and insider risk management, because these are the major threats to an organization that can't be easily traced."
"MIP also provides strong information rights management settings, such as the ability to specify who has access to content and at what time."
"The most significant value lies in its seamless integration into the Azure ecosystem, automating various processes and reducing operational burdens."
"Data authentication enables us to classify documents based on whether they should be restricted for internal consumption or permitted for external sharing."
"It is very easy to learn the interface, and it is very user-friendly."
"My favorite Purview feature is auto-scanning. Once we set up Purview, we can automatically scan multiple data sources when new data comes into specific databases, like SQL and Oracle. We don't need to rediscover the new data or do anything manually because it automatically happens."
"Data segregation is the most valuable feature."
"One valuable aspect of the solution is its cloud-based nature. Users can just pay the fees and get started instantly."
"This product makes it easy to manage personal data."
"The tool gives us the ability to trace the path of an incident."
"Support should be improved in the form of good documentation and video lessons where a person can check things out. There is a community, but it takes a lot of time if we want to get an answer to a question."
"The API needs some improvement when connecting to non-Microsoft API sources. This is a limiting factor."
"Overcoming certain control issues would significantly enhance our overall satisfaction."
"There are some limitations with regard to the lineage of data from different parts of the system."
"he one thing it doesn't do is data quality."
"There is room for improvement when it comes to Purview's data connector platform in supporting ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources."
"The Microsoft Purview data connector platform, which supports ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources, can be somewhat complex."
"Purview's data loss prevention for macOS endpoints has some limitations, and the end-user experience of recovering from a failure is lacking."
"Deployment is a big issue."
"The integration with third-party products could be better."
"The tool is an amalgam. It's a collection of loosely integrated pieces and parts that don't work well together. There is room for improvement there. My team reached out to the support team, and their experience was not satisfactory."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is ranked 1st in Data Governance with 48 reviews while OneTrust DataGovernance is ranked 24th in Data Governance with 3 reviews. Microsoft Purview Data Governance is rated 7.6, while OneTrust DataGovernance is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Governance writes "User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneTrust DataGovernance writes "Good cloud-based solution requiring improvement in terms of integration". Microsoft Purview Data Governance is most compared with Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest, whereas OneTrust DataGovernance is most compared with BigID, Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and Alation Data Catalog. See our Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. OneTrust DataGovernance report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.